Six sigma project selection using data envelopment analysis

被引:0
作者
Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore, India [1 ]
不详 [2 ]
机构
[1] Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore
[2] Department of Systems Engineering and Engineering Management, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ
来源
TQM Mag. | 2007年 / 5卷 / 419-441期
关键词
Data analysis; Optimization techniques; Project planning; Six sigma;
D O I
10.1108/09544780710817856
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose - The evolution of six sigma has morphed from a method or set of techniques to a movement focused on business-process improvement. Business processes are transformed through the successful selection and implementation of competing six sigma projects. However, the efforts to implement a six sigma process improvement initiative alone do not guarantee success. To meet aggressive schedules and tight budget constraints, a successful six sigma project needs to follow the proven define, measure, analyze, improve, and control methodology. Any slip in schedule or cost overrun is likely to offset the potential benefits achieved by implementing six sigma projects. The purpose of this paper is to focus on six sigma projects targeted at improving the overall customer satisfaction called Big Q projects. The aim is to develop a mathematical model to select one or more six sigma projects that result in the maximum benefit to the organization. Design/methodology/approach - This research provides the identification of important inputs and outputs for six sigma projects that are then analyzed using data envelopment analysis (DEA) to identify projects, which result in maximum benefit. Maximum benefit here provides a Pareto optimal solution based on inputs and outputs directly related to the efficiency of the six sigma projects under study. A sensitivity analysis of efficiency measurement is also carried out to study the impact of variation in projects' inputs and outputs on project performance and to identify the critical inputs and outputs. Findings - DEA, often used for relative efficiency analysis and productivity analysis, is now successfully constructed for six sigma project selection. Practical implications - Provides a practical approach to guide the selection of six sigma projects for implementation, especially for companies with limited resources. The sensitivity analysis discussed in the paper helps to understand the uncertainties in project inputs and outputs. Originality/value - This paper introduces DEA as a tool for six sigma project selection. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
引用
收藏
页码:419 / 441
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Project selection through fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and a case study on Six Sigma implementation in an automotive industry
    Bilgen, Bilge
    Sen, Mutlu
    PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2012, 23 (01) : 2 - 25
  • [42] Multi-factor menu analysis using data envelopment analysis
    Taylor, Jim
    Reynolds, Dennis
    Brown, Denise M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, 2009, 21 (02) : 213 - 225
  • [43] A data envelopment analysis approach based on total cost of ownership for supplier selection
    Mohammady Garfamy, Reza
    JOURNAL OF ENTERPRISE INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2006, 19 (06) : 662 - +
  • [44] Market Basket Analysis with Data Mining Methods Six Sigma methodology improvement
    Trnka, Andrej
    2010 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NETWORKING AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (ICNIT 2010), 2010, : 446 - 450
  • [45] Six Sigma Improvement Project for Automotive Speakers in an Assembly Process
    Valles, Adan
    Noriega, Salvador
    Sanchez, Jaime
    Martinez, Erwin
    Salinas, Jesus
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING-THEORY APPLICATIONS AND PRACTICE, 2009, 16 (03): : 182 - 190
  • [46] Six Sigma and operational absorptive capacity: the role of project leader
    Arumugam, V.
    Linderman, Kevin
    TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2022, 33 (5-6) : 509 - 528
  • [47] Using Six Sigma DMAIC for Lean project management in education: a case study in a German kindergarten
    Antony, Jiju
    Scheumann, Tim
    Sunder, Vijaya M.
    Cudney, Elizabeth
    Rodgers, Bryan
    Grigg, Nigel P.
    TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2022, 33 (13-14) : 1489 - 1509
  • [48] Using Logic Concepts on Six Sigma
    Kirilo, Caique Z.
    Abe, Jair M.
    Lozano, Luiz
    Parreira, Renato H.
    Dacorso, Eduardo P.
    ADVANCES IN PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: INITIATIVES FOR A SUSTAINABLE WORLD, 2016, 488 : 36 - 42
  • [49] Six Sigma literature: a bibliometric analysis
    Ninerola, Angels
    Sanchez-Rebull, Maria-Victoria
    Hernandez-Lara, Ana-Beatriz
    TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2021, 32 (9-10) : 959 - 980
  • [50] The influence of challenging goals and structured method on Six Sigma project performance: A mediated moderation analysis
    Arumugam, V.
    Antony, Jiju
    Linderman, Kevin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2016, 254 (01) : 202 - 213