Seismic response analysis of SDOF systems with disc spring- or shape memory alloy- based self-centering slip friction dampers: A comparative study

被引:1
作者
Sun, Shiyuan [1 ]
Qiu, Canxing [1 ]
Xiao, Feng [1 ]
Du, Xiuli [1 ]
Liu, Hang [2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Technol, Key Lab Urban Secur & Disaster Engn, Minist Educ, Beijing 100124, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Bldg Construct Res Inst Co Ltd, Beijing 100039, Peoples R China
关键词
Self-centering; Slip friction damper; SMA; SDOF; Comparative study; PERFORMANCE; DESIGN; ENERGY; RESISTANCE; BUILDINGS; BEHAVIOR; FRAME;
D O I
10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107968
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Owing to excellent recentering capability and satisfactory damping capacity, self-centering (SC) dampers are promising alternatives of conventional seismic dampers, if residual deformation is designated with a substantial weight in measuring seismic resilience. Recently, SC slip friction dampers (SCSFDs) attract wide attentions among the earthquake engineering community. SCSFDs mainly consist of recentering elements (springs) and friction plates. According to the springs that are utilized, SC slip friction dampers are divided into the disc spring (DS)- based ones and shape memory alloy (SMA)- based ones. The difference between the DS and SMA is that the former has zero damping ability, whereas the latter could dissipate energy through inherent hysteretic behavior. However, the effect of such difference on the seismic behavior of systems with different dampers remains unknown. Besides, the coefficient of kinetic friction of the friction plates, which is critical to the hysteresis width of SCSFDs, also requires extensive discussions. To this end, this paper makes comprehensive comparisons between single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) linear systems with DS- or SMA- based SCSFDs. Two example structures are firstly used for preliminarily understanding the response differences. And then, the observations are further extended to systems with various strength capacities, fundamental periods and seismic intensities.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures
[2]   New Self-Centering Tension-Only Brace Using Resilient Slip-Friction Joint: Experimental Tests and Numerical Analysis [J].
Bagheri, Hamed ;
Hashemi, Ashkan ;
Yousef-Beik, S. M. M. ;
Zarnani, Pouyan ;
Quenneville, Pierre .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 146 (10)
[3]   Enhanced design and experimental investigation of disc spring-based self-centering buckling-restrained braces with a compounded combination mode [J].
Chen, Peng ;
Xu, Longhe ;
Xie, Xingsi .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2023, 52 (10) :3053-3073
[4]  
Chopra AK, 2020, Dynamics of Structures, DOI DOI 10.1193/1.2720354
[5]   Self-centering energy dissipative bracing system for the seismic resistance of structures: Development and validation [J].
Christopoulos, C. ;
Tremblay, R. ;
Kim, H. -J. ;
Lacerte, M. .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2008, 134 (01) :96-107
[6]   Seismic response of self-centring hysteretic SDOF systems [J].
Christopoulos, C ;
Filiatrault, A ;
Folz, B .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2002, 31 (05) :1131-1150
[7]   Shape memory alloys in seismic resistant design and retrofit: A critical review of their potential and limitations [J].
Desroches, R ;
Smith, B .
JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2004, 8 (03) :415-429
[8]   Cyclic properties of superelastic shape memory alloy wires and bars [J].
DesRoches, R ;
McCormick, J ;
Delemont, M .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2004, 130 (01) :38-46
[9]   Self-Centering Structures Against Earthquakes: A Critical Review [J].
Fang, Cheng ;
Qiu, Canxing ;
Wang, Wei ;
Alam, M. Shahria .
JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2023, 27 (15) :4354-4389
[10]   Seismic Performance of Self-centering Steel Frames with SMA-viscoelastic Hybrid Braces [J].
Fang, Cheng ;
Ping, Yiwei ;
Chen, Yiyi ;
Yam, M. C. H. ;
Chen, Junbai ;
Wang, Wei .
JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2022, 26 (10) :5004-5031