GHop: A New Regional Tropospheric Zenith Delay Model

被引：0
|
作者：
Yang H. [1 ,2 ]
Hu W. [1 ]
Yu L. [1 ]
Nie X. [1 ]
Li H. [1 ]
机构：
[1] School of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjing
[2] Ningbo Branch of China Mobile Communications Group Zhejiang Co. Ltd, Ningbo
来源：
Hu, Wusheng (13705151633@163.com) | 1600年 / Editorial Board of Medical Journal of Wuhan University卷 / 45期
基金：
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词：
Accuracy analysis; GHop model; Hopfield model; Tropospheric delay;
D O I：
10.13203/j.whugis20180167
中图分类号：
P4 [大气科学（气象学）];
学科分类号：
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要：
To solve the problems of low accuracy and poor stability in the traditional estimation of zenith delay, a method of adding annual and semi-annual periodic terms on the basis of Hopfield model is proposed. Based on the atmospheric data of the global geodetic observation system at 45 stations from 2012 to 2014 in China, the time series and spectrum distribution of zenith tropospheric delay (ZTD) and residual Hopfield model are analyzed. With the introduction of annual and semi-annual cycle term, the GHop model suitable for China region is established, and the accuracy and adaptation of the two models are evaluated. The results show that the deviation and middle error of Hopfield model represent obvious seasonal variation in time, while GHop model is small and stable. In terms of spatial distribution, the Hopfield model varies greatly with the increase of elevation and latitude, GHop model can adapt to different latitudes and elevation ranges. Annual deviation of coincidence accuracy in GHop is 28% higher than that of Hopfield, and 76 radiosensory data in China are used for external coincidence test. The statistical results are better than those of Hopfield model. The ZTD results calculated by the proposed method are more reliable and have high practical value. © 2020, Research and Development Office of Wuhan University. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：226 / 232
页数：6
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Tang W., Liu Q., Gao K., Et al., Influence of BDS Pseudorange Code Biases on Baseline Resolution, Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 43, 8, pp. 1199-1206, (2018)
  • [2] Zhao J., Song S., Chen Q., Et al., The Establishment of Global Tropospheric Zenith Delay Model Based on the Function of Vertical Section, Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 57, 10, pp. 3140-3153, (2014)
  • [3] Li W., Yuan Y., Ou J., Et al., New Versions of the BDS/GNSS Zenith Tropospheric Delay Model IGGtrop, Journal of Geodesy, 89, 1, pp. 73-80, (2015)
  • [4] Lomb N.R., Least-Squares Frequency Analysis of Unequally Spaced Data, Astrophysics & Space Science, 39, 2, pp. 447-462, (1976)
  • [5] Lagler K., Schindelegger M., Bohm J., Et al., GPT2: Empirical Slant Delay Model for Radio Space Geodetic Techniques, Geophysical Research Letters, 40, 6, pp. 1069-1073, (2013)
  • [6] Davis J.L., Herring T.A., Shapiro I.I., Et al., Geodesy by Radio Interferometry: Effects of Atmospheric Modeling Errors on Estimates of Baseline Length, Radio Science, 20, 6, pp. 1593-1607, (2016)
  • [7] Leandro R.F., Langley R.B., Santos M.C., UNB3m_pack: A Neutral Atmosphere Delay Package for Radiometric Space Techniques, GPS Solutions, 12, 1, pp. 65-70, (2008)
  • [8] Wu W., Chen X., Sun J., Et al., Improved Tropospheric Zenith Delay Estimation Method, Journal of Detection and Control, 38, 5, pp. 96-100, (2016)
  • [9] Zhang J., Cheng P., Cai Y., Study on the High Precision Tropospheric Zenith Wet Delay Model, Surveying Science, 39, 10, pp. 33-36, (2014)
  • [10] Mao J., Zhu C., Guo J., A New Global Tropospheric Zenith Delay Model, Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 38, 6, pp. 684-688, (2013)
12