Optimisation of process parameters in solid lubricant (MoS2) assisted machining of AISI 1040 steel by response surface methodology

被引:1
作者
Srivastava, Rajeev [1 ]
Srivastava, R.K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Mechanical Engineering, Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology, Allahabad, UP
关键词
Analysis of variance; ANOVA; Approach angle; CCD; Central composite design; Response surface methodology; RSM; SLAM; Solid lubricant assisted machining; Surface finish;
D O I
10.1504/IJMMM.2008.020914
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The machining of materials has received substantial attention due to the increasing use of machining processes in various industrial applications. Machining leads to high friction between tool and work piece interface and can result in high temperatures, impairing the dimensional accuracy and the surface quality of products. The conventional machining has problem, like high machining zone temperature which may lead to poor surface quality. Machining fluids are applied in different forms to control such high temperature but they are partially effective within a narrow working range, recent studies also indicate their polluting nature. Solid Lubricant Assisted Machining (SLAM) is a novel concept to control the machining zone temperature without polluting the environment. In this study, the experimental set-up for the solid lubricant powder feeder arrangement is designed and fabricated on the lathe machine. The application of Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and Central Composite Design (CCD) for modelling the influence of operating variables on the performance of surface roughness during SLAM are studied. The mathematical model equations were developed for surface roughness using set of experimental data by computer simulation applying least squares method. The developed equations are third-order response functions representing surface roughness of AISI 1040 steel, as functions of four operating variables of SLAM. The predicted values of surface roughness were found to be in good agreement with experimental values for third order model when compared to second order model. The obtained coefficients of multiple regression (R2) values are 0.8686 and 0.9930 for second and third order model, respectively. The 3D response surfaces and contours were plotted using MATLAB7.0.1 with experimental data to obtain the desired set of process parameters within the operating range of process variables during SLAM of AISI 1040 Steel. © 2008, Inderscience Publishers.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 128
页数:17
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Aslan N., Application of response surface methodology and central composite design for modeling the influence of some operating variables of a Multi-Gravity Separator for coal cleaning, Fuel, 86, pp. 769-776, (2007)
[2]  
Benardos P.G., Vosmakos G.-C., Predicting surface roughness in machining: A review, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacturer, 43, pp. 833-844, (2003)
[3]  
Box G.E.P., Wilson K.B., On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B Statistical Method, 13, pp. 1-45, (1951)
[4]  
Cali M., Santarelli M.G.L., Leone P., Design of experiments for fitting regression models on the tubular SOFC CHP kWe: Screening test, response surface analysis and optimization, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 32, pp. 343-358, (2007)
[5]  
Choudary I.A., El-Baradie M.A., Surface roughness prediction in the turning of high-strength steel by factorial design of experiments, Journal of Material Processing Tehnology, 67, pp. 55-61, (1997)
[6]  
Correia D.S., da Cunha S.S., Comparison between genetic algorithms and response surface methodology in GMAW welding optimization, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 160, pp. 70-76, (2005)
[7]  
Diniz A.E., Micaroni R., Cutting conditions for finish turning process aiming: The use of dry cutting, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 42, pp. 899-904, (2002)
[8]  
Gan H.E., Karim R., Muhammad S.K.S., Baker J.A., Hashmi D.M., Rahman R.A., Optimization of the basic formulation of a traditional baked cassava cake using response surface methodology, LWT, 40, pp. 611-618, (2007)
[9]  
Grum J., Slabe J.M., The use of factorial design and response surface methodology for fast determination of optimal heat treatment conditions of different Ni-Co-Mo surfaced layers, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 155, pp. 2026-2032, (2004)
[10]  
Gunraj V., Murugan N., Application of response surface methodology for predicting weld base quality in submerged are welding of pipes, Journal of Material Processing Technology, 88, pp. 266-275, (1999)