Measuring the international usage of US institutional repositories

被引:7
作者
Fralinger, Lauren [1 ]
Bull, Jonathan [1 ]
机构
[1] Christopher Center Library Services, Valparaiso University, Valparaiso, IN
来源
OCLC Systems and Services | 2013年 / 29卷 / 03期
关键词
Academic libraries; Assessment; Institutional repositories; Internationalization; Return-on-investment; United States of America; Usage statistics;
D O I
10.1108/OCLC-10-2012-0039
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: In an educational world with increasing internationalization, digitization, assessment and financial justification, US institutions, especially academic libraries, must justify each new project. Institutional Repositories (IRs) are no exception. The authors attempt to identify factors that might affect the international usage of US IRs as part of assessment efforts to determine an IR's return-on-investment. Design/methodology/approach: A survey was disseminated to IR administrators asking for demographic information, international usage counts for website hits and downloads, and any internationalization efforts connected to the IR in order to determine any influencing factors on an IR's international usage. Findings: While many IRs reported various rates of international usage, the largest group of respondents did not report an international usage rate for both page hits and downloads, despite overwhelmingly expressing an importance of international traffic to their IR and parent institution. Research limitations/implications: It is not clear if this non-reporting of international usage could be due to ignorance, apathy, or lack of technological support on the part of the IR administrators. Practical implications: Determining international usage as a part of an IR assessment might be problematic or even impossible for many US IRs. Originality/value: This study suggests that many IR administrators either do not know, do not care, and/or cannot record international usage data for their respective IRs, which could hinder determining an international return-on-investment for the IR. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
引用
收藏
页码:134 / 150
页数:16
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Bailey C., Coombs K., Emery J., Mitchell A., Morris C., Simons S., Wright R., Spec Kit 292: Institutional Repositories, (2006)
[2]  
Usage Reports: Introduction to Digital Commons Reports, (2012)
[3]  
Cassella M., Institutional repositories: An internal and external perspective on the value of IRs for researchers' communities, Liber Quarterly, 20, 2, pp. 210-225, (2010)
[4]  
Chan L., Costa S., Participation in the global knowledge commons, New Library World, 106, 3-4, pp. 141-163, (2005)
[5]  
Diggory M., DSpace Statistics, (2012)
[6]  
Simple usage statistics (using analog), (2012)
[7]  
Jain P., New trends and future applications/directions of institutional repositories in academic institutions, Library Review, 60, 2, pp. 125-141, (2011)
[8]  
Lynch L., Lippincott J., Institutional repository deployment in the United States as of early 2005, D-Lib Magazine, 11, 9, (2005)
[9]  
McDowell C.S., Evaluating institutional repository deployment in American academe since early 2005: Repositories by the numbers, D-Lib Magazine, 13, 9-10, (2007)
[10]  
Nykanen M., Institutional repositories at small institutions in America: Some current trends, Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 23, 1, pp. 1-19, (2011)