Accuracy analysis of a simplified algorithm for seismic response analysis of two supports structures under multi-support excitation

被引：0
作者：
Zhao, Bo [1 ]
Wang, Yuan-Qing [2 ]
Chen, Zhi-Hua [1 ]
Shi, Yong-Jiu [2 ]
Jiang, Yang [2 ]
机构：
[1] School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin
[2] Key Laboratory of Structural Engineering and Vibration of Education Ministry, Department of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing
来源：
Zhendong yu Chongji/Journal of Vibration and Shock | 2015年 / 34卷 / 09期
关键词：
Multi-support excitation; Seismic response; Sum of squares and square root (SRSS) method; Two supports structures;
D O I：
10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2015.09.004
中图分类号：
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号：
07 ;
摘要：
On the base of response spectrum CQC method considering all the coupling items, an approximate SRSS algorithm ignoring relevant coupling terms was given. Due to the specialty of structures with two supports, a simplified algorithm for analysing quasi-static response of this type of structures was put forward. Taking a typical two supports structure as example, the accuracy of the approximate algorithm of SRSS was analyzed. The results show that the error of SRSS method mainly comes from ignoring quasi-static and relative dynamic coupling terms, but not modal coupling terms. The stronger the traveling-wave effect is, the bigger the error of the approximate algorithm will be. But according to the calculation results of actual engineering structures, within the range of the common wave velocity, the computation errors of displacement and internal force of the two approximate algorithms keep within 10% and 15% respectively. So it is feasible to use approximate algorithm of SRSS for seismic response analysis of two supports structures under multi-support excitation. ©, 2015, Chinese Vibration Engineering Society. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：21 / 25and37
页数：2516
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] Kiureghian A.D., A coherency modal for spatiallyvarying ground motions, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 25, 1, pp. 99-111, (1996)
  • [2] Su L., Dong S.-L., Kato S., Seismic design for steel trussed arch to multi-support excitations, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 63, 6, pp. 725-734, (2007)
  • [3] Ding Y., Yue Z.-G., Liu X.-L., Seismic response analysis of long-span beam string structures, Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 23, 5, pp. 163-168, (2003)
  • [4] Jiang Y., Shi Y.-J., Wang Y.-Q., Et al., Seismic response analysis of large-span gate-type tube truss structures under multi-support excitation, Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University, 33, 4, pp. 88-93, (2009)
  • [5] Su L., Dong S.-L., Kato S., A new average response spectrum method for linear response analysis of structures to spatial earthquake ground motions, Engineering Structures, 28, 13, pp. 1835-1842, (2006)
  • [6] Kiureghian A.D., Neuenhofer A., Response spectrum method for multi-support seismicexcitations, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 21, 8, pp. 713-740, (1992)
  • [7] Luco J., Wong H., Response of a rigid foundation to a spatially random ground motion, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 14, 8, pp. 891-908, (1986)
  • [8] Clough R.W., Penzien J., Dynamics of Structures, (1993)
  • [9] Xue S.-D., Wang X.-S., Cao Z., Parameters study on seismic random model based on the new seismic code, China Civil Engineering Journal, 36, 5, pp. 5-10, (2003)
1