Quality assurance of magnetic resonance imaging for a polymer gel dosimeter using a 3D-printed phantom

被引:2
作者
Tachibana, Hidenobu [1 ]
Hoshino, Yoshihiko [2 ]
Watanabe, Yusuke [3 ]
Usui, Keisuke [4 ]
Mizukami, Shinya [3 ]
Shibukawa, Shuhei [4 ,5 ]
Kodama, Takashi [6 ]
Tachibana, Rie [7 ]
机构
[1] Natl Canc Ctr Hosp East, Radiat Safety & Qual Assurance Div, Chiba 2778577, Japan
[2] Gunma Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Gunma 3718511, Japan
[3] Kitasato Univ, Sch Allied Hlth Sci, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 2520373, Japan
[4] Juntendo Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Radiol Technol, Tokyo 1130034, Japan
[5] Univ Tokyo, Ctr Evolutionary Cognit Sci, Grad Sch Art & Sci, Tokyo 1530041, Japan
[6] Tokyo Med Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Therapy, Tokyo 1600023, Japan
[7] Triangle Prod Co Ltd, Chiba, 2770882, Japan
关键词
3D printer; Polymer gel dosimeter; Magnetic resonance imaging; Quality assurance; Radiotherapy; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.radphyschem.2024.112196
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Purpose Quality assurance (QA) of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for gel dosimetry using an in-house phantom was established to ensure consistent dosimetric performance. Methods A normoxic N-vinylpyrrolidone-based gel dosimeter sensitized with an inorganic salt was used. Each individual gel dosimeter, in addition to a specially designed image QA phantom, was imaged at three institutions with different MRI systems. Results Both the gel dosimeter and QA phantom had linear dose-response curves at all institutions, with correlation coefficients = 1.00 and >= 0.99, respectively. Minor inter-institutional variations in the sensitivity (gel dosimeter, 0.096 +/- 0.010 s(-1)Gy(-1); QA phantom, 0.140 +/- 0.003 s(-1)Gy(-1)) and offset value (gel dosimeter, 2.188 +/- 0.222 s(-1); QA phantom, 3.318 +/- 0.081 s(-1)) were found. Dose uncertainties for the gel dosimeter ranged from 3.2% to 3.5% at 10 Gy and 1.7%-2.1% at 20 Gy, and these were comparable with the corresponding QA phantom uncertainties. Dose resolutions were 0.8-1.2 Gy for the gel dosimeter and 0.6-1.4 Gy for the QA phantom. Uniformity factors were >= 98% at all institutions. Spatial linearity had a geometric distortion <= 1.0%, Gamma passing rates of 95%-100% met recommended QA guidelines; strong correlations between the QA phantom and gel dosimeter were also obtained for each of these measures. Conclusion Our study demonstrates the viability of applying MRI acquisition parameters validated using a QA phantom to polymer gel dosimetry across diverse MRI systems. This approach enables robust QA measures, focusing on effective management of uniformity and dose uncertainty.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Delivered Dose Distribution Visualized Directly With Onboard kV-CBCT: Proof of Principle [J].
Adamson, Justus ;
Carroll, Jaclyn ;
Trager, Michael ;
Yoon, Suk Whan ;
Kodra, Jacob ;
Maynard, Evan ;
Hilts, Michelle ;
Oldham, Mark ;
Jirasek, Andrew .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2019, 103 (05) :1271-1279
[2]   A method for obtaining three-dimensional measurements of HDR brachytherapy dose distributions using Fricke gel dosimeters and optical computed tomography [J].
Asena, Andre ;
Nilsson, Sanna ;
Smith, Shaun T. ;
Kairn, Tanya ;
Crowe, Scott B. ;
Trapp, Jamie V. .
AUSTRALASIAN PHYSICAL & ENGINEERING SCIENCES IN MEDICINE, 2019, 42 (01) :221-226
[3]   Dose resolution in radiotherapy polymer gel dosimetry:: effect of echo spacing in MRI pulse sequence [J].
Baldock, C ;
Lepage, M ;
Bäck, SÅJ ;
Murry, PJ ;
Jayasekera, PM ;
Porter, D ;
Kron, T .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2001, 46 (02) :449-460
[4]   Uncertainty analysis in polymer gel dosimetry [J].
Baldock, C ;
Murry, P ;
Kron, T .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1999, 44 (11) :N243-N246
[5]   Intensity non-uniformity correction in MRI: Existing methods and their validation [J].
Belaroussi, B ;
Milles, J ;
Carme, S ;
Zhu, YM ;
Benoit-Cattin, H .
MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2006, 10 (02) :234-246
[6]   Dosimetric characterization and use of GAFCHROMIC EBT3 film for IMRT dose verification [J].
Borca, Valeria Casanova ;
Pasquino, Massimo ;
Russo, Giuliana ;
Grosso, Pierangelo ;
Cante, Domenico ;
Sciacero, Piera ;
Girelli, Giuseppe ;
La Porta, Maria Rosa ;
Tofani, Santi .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 14 (02) :158-171
[7]   Intracranial and Extracranial Progression and Their Correlation With Overall Survival After Stereotactic Radiosurgery in a Multi-institutional Cohort With Brain Metastases [J].
Carpenter, David J. ;
Leng, Jim ;
Arshad, Muzamil ;
Giles, Will ;
Kirkpatrick, John P. ;
Floyd, Scott R. ;
Chmura, Steven J. ;
Salama, Joseph K. ;
Hong, Julian C. .
JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2023, 6 (04) :E2310117
[8]   Quantitative and qualitative assessment of structural magnetic resonance imaging data in a two-center study [J].
Chalavi, Sima ;
Simmons, Andrew ;
Dijkstra, Hildebrand ;
Barker, Gareth J. ;
Reinders, A. A. T. Simone .
BMC MEDICAL IMAGING, 2012, 12
[9]  
De Deene Yves, 2010, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, V250, DOI 10.1088/1742-6596/250/1/012015
[10]  
De Deene Yves, 2009, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, V164, DOI 10.1088/1742-6596/164/1/012033