Analyze the effect of energy efficiency, natural resources, and the digital economy on ecological footprint in OCED countries: The mediating role of renewable energy

被引:4
作者
Zhao D. [1 ]
Lin J. [1 ]
Bashir M.A. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] College of Economics, Shenzhen University, Guangdong, Shenzhen
[2] Guangdong Institute for International Strategies, University of Foreign Studies, Guangdong, Guangzhou
[3] Huangpu Institute, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangdong, Guangzhou
关键词
Ecological footprint; Energy efficiency; MMQR; Natural resources; The digital economy;
D O I
10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105198
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Considering the urgent target of carbon neutrality and environmental sustainability, this paper analyzes the nexus of energy efficiency, natural resources, and the digital economy on ecological footprint in OECD countries from 2002 to 2020. We apply the Method of Moments Quantile Regression (MMQR) to evaluate the long-run relationship of variables and check the mediating effect of renewable energy between the digital economy and ecological footprint. Through a series of empirical analyses, the primary results are as follows. First, it has been discovered that energy efficiency and natural resources contribute to decreasing ecological footprint. Second, the digital economy exerts a detrimental impact on the lowering of the ecological footprint. Third, the mediating outcome suggests that the digital economy cannot promote an ecological footprint decrease with the development of renewable energy. Based on the findings, we also recommend some ideas for OECD countries’ economy, energy, and environmental improvements. © 2024 Elsevier Ltd
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 75 条
  • [1] Adnan Bashir M., Dengfeng Z., Zofia Filipiak B., Bilan Y., Vasa L., Role of economic complexity and technological innovation for ecological footprint in newly industrialized countries: does geothermal energy consumption matter?, Renew. Energy, (2023)
  • [2] Ali K., Jianguo D., Kirikkaleli D., Modeling the natural resources and financial inclusion on ecological footprint: the role of economic governance institutions. Evidence from ECOWAS economies, Resour. Pol., (2022)
  • [3] Ali Chandio A., Nasereldin Y.A., Khan I., Tang Y., Jiang Y., Does rural financial development facilitate food production? Evidence from major wheat–producing provinces of China, Cogent Food Agric., 9, 2, (2023)
  • [4] Ali M., Joof F., Ahmed S., Tursoy T., Balsalobre-Lorente D., Radulescu M., Testing the impacts of renewable energy, natural resources rent, and technological innovation on the ecological footprint in the USA: evidence from Bootstrapping ARDL, Resour. Pol., (2023)
  • [5] Ali Chandio A., Gokmenoglu K.K., Khan I., Ahmad F., Jiang Y., Does internet technology usage improve food production? Recent evidence from major rice-producing provinces of China, Comput. Electron. Agric., (2023)
  • [6] AlNemer H.A., Hkiri B., Tissaoui K., Dynamic impact of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on CO2 emission and economic growth in Saudi Arabia: fresh evidence from wavelet coherence analysis, Renew. Energy, (2023)
  • [7] Anu A.K.S., Ali Raza S., Nakonieczny J., Shahzad U., Role of financial inclusion, green innovation, and energy efficiency for environmental performance? Evidence from developed and emerging economies in the lens of sustainable development, Struct. Change Econ. Dynam., (2023)
  • [8] Appiah M., Li M., Naeem M.A., Karim S., Greening the globe: uncovering the impact of environmental policy, renewable energy, and innovation on ecological footprint, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, (2023)
  • [9] Arshad Ansari M., Re-visiting the Environmental Kuznets curve for ASEAN: a comparison between ecological footprint and carbon dioxide emissions, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., (2022)
  • [10] Bano S., Liu L., Khan A., Dynamic influence of aging, industrial innovations, and ICT on tourism development and renewable energy consumption in BRICS economies, Renew. Energy, (2022)