Control in software project portfolios: A complex adaptive systems approach

被引:0
作者
Sweetman, Roger [1 ]
O’Dwyer, Orla [1 ]
Conboy, Kieran [1 ]
机构
[1] Discipline of Business Information Systems, National University of Ireland, Galway
来源
Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing | 2014年 / 199卷
基金
爱尔兰科学基金会;
关键词
Agile methods; Complex adaptive systems; Control; Large-scale agile software development; Project portfolio management;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-14358-3_9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Effective project portfolio management (PPM) can both help reverse the prevailing trend of software failure and act as a key driver of business value. Despite the importance of PPM and its success in other disciplines such as finance and new product development, it has not been studied widely in information systems with little research examining PPM in an agile context. This study proposes to address this gap by using complex adaptive systems theory as a lens to study the enactment and effectiveness of four known modes of control (behavior, outcome, clan and self) in agile software project portfolios. It proposes an interpretivist approach using exploratory case studies to investigate portfolio control in its natural context. This study will contribute to the advancement of control theory and provide new insights for theory and practice by integrating the study of PPM and control in an agile environment. © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 104
页数:11
相关论文
共 95 条
  • [1] Abrahamsson P., Conboy K., Wang X., Lots done, more to do': The current state of agile systems development research, European Journal of Information Systems, 18, 4, pp. 281-284, (2009)
  • [2] Dyba T., Dingsoyr T., Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review, Information and Software Technology, 50, 9-10, pp. 833-859, (2008)
  • [3] Conboy K., Project failure en masse: A study of loose budgetary control in ISD projects, European Journal of Information Systems, 19, 3, pp. 273-287, (2010)
  • [4] CHAOS Manifesto The Laws of CHAOS and the CHAOS 100 Best PM Practices, (2010)
  • [5] Lindvall M., Et al., Agile software development in large organizations, Computer, 37, 12, pp. 26-34, (2004)
  • [6] Boehm B., Get ready for agile methods, with care, Computer, 35, 1, pp. 64-69, (2002)
  • [7] Dingsoyr T., Moe N.B., Research challenges in large-scale agile software development, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 38, 5, pp. 38-39, (2013)
  • [8] Whittaker B., What went wrong? Unsuccessful information technology projects, Information Management and Computer Security, 7, 1, pp. 23-29, (1999)
  • [9] Keil M., Mann J., Rai A., Why software projects escalate: An empirical analysis and test of four theoretical models 1, 2, Mis Quarterly, 24, 4, pp. 631-664, (2000)
  • [10] Bartis E., Mitev N., A multiple narrative approach to information systems failure: A successful system that failed, European Journal of Information Systems, 17, 2, pp. 112-124, (2008)