The interaction of machine and rock mass analysed using TBM data and rock mass parameters; [Interaktion Maschine-Gebirge analysiert mittels TBM-daten und Gebirgskennwerten]

被引：0

作者：

Poisel R. ^{[1
]}

Tentschert E. ^{[1
]}

Preh A. ^{[1
]}

Ostermann V. ^{[1
]}

Chwatal W. ^{[2
]}

Zettler A. ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Vienna University of Technology, Institute for Geotechnics, A-1040 Vienna

[2] Vienna University of Technology, Institute for Geodesy and Geophysics, A-1040 Vienna

[3] Zconsult ZT, A-9500 Villach

来源：

Geomechanik und Tunnelbau | 2010年 / 3卷 / 05期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1002/geot.201000043

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Statistical investigations of TBM data and rock parameters have shown that interactions determined theoretically or in the laboratory are often not realistic because the interaction of the machine with the rock mass is considerably influenced by the type of machine in use, the machine driver and the characteristics of the rock mass. Evaluations of excavation data have shown that the maximum net advance rate is not produced by the maximum thrust force, even in the same rock type. Individualised optimisation of the interaction on the basis of continuously recorded machine data and basic information about the rock mass (type of rock, degree of jointing), which can be determined by geological and geophysical investigations during tunnelling, is therefore of particular significance for economical tunnelling. The evaluation of these data should not replace but rather supplement the control of the machine by the driver. © 2010 Ernst & Sohn Verlag für Architektur und technische Wissenschaften GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin.

引用

页码：510 / 519

页数：9

共 31 条

[1]

Alber M., An integrated approach to penetration, advance rates and disc cutter wear for hard rock TBM drives, Geomechanics and Tunnelling, 1, 1, pp. 29-37, (2008)

[2]

Aoki K., Mito Y., Yamamoto T., Shirasagi S., Geostatis tical Evaluation of the Mechanical Properties of Rock Mass for TBM Tunnelling by Seismic Reflection Method, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 40, 6, pp. 591-602, (2007)

[3]

Bach D., Fuchs W., Lehner W., Obermeier O., Tunnelkette Perschling- Reiserbergtunnel and Stierschweiffeldtunnel: TBM success under difficult ground conditions, Geomechanics and Tunnelling, 1, 6, pp. 567-575, (2008)

[4]

Barton N., TBM Tunneling in Jointed and Faulted Rock, (2000)

[5]

Bieniawski Z.T., Tunnel design by rock mass classifications, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, (1990)

[6]

Bitschnau M., Gappmaier F., Weber W., Hieflau power station extension - mechanical tunnelling with innovative solutions, Geomechanics and Tunnelling, 2, 1, pp. 85-93, (2009)

[7]

Bruckl E., Chwatal W., Mertl S., Radinger A., Continuous exploration ahead of the tunnel face by TSWD - Tunnel Seismic White Drilling, Proceedings at EEGS' Annual Meeting Keystone, pp. 353-360, (2010)

[8]

Bruckl E., Chwatal W., Mertl S., Radinger A., Explo- ration Ahead of a Tunnel Face by TSWD-Tunnel Seismic White Drilling, Geomechanics and Tunnelling, 1, 5, pp. 460-465, (2008)

[9]

Frenzel C., Kasling H., Thuro K., Factors influencing disc cutter wear, Geomechanics and Tunnelling, 1, 1, pp. 55-60, (2008)

[10]

Gehring K., Classification of drillability, cuttability, borability and abrasivity in tunnelling, Felsbau, 15, pp. 183-191, (1997)

← 1 2 3 4 →