Applicability of FAO56 and ASCE Penman-Monteith equations for reference crop evapotranspiration calculation on turf grass

被引：0

作者：

Xu, Junzeng ^{[1
]}

Peng, Shizhang ^{[1
]}

Zhang, Xingnan ^{[1
]}

Ding, Jiali ^{[2
]}

Wang, Weiguang ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering, Hohai University

[2] Bureau of Water Conservancy

来源：

Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering | 2009年 / 25卷 / 12期

关键词：

Crops; Evapotranspiration; Penman-Monteith; Reference crop evapotranspiration; Turf grass; Water;

D O I：

10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2009.12.006

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

In order to reveal the difference between hourly reference crop evapotranspiration(ET0) calculated by FAO56 Penman- Monteith equation and that by ASCE Penman-Monteith , as well as the 24-hour accumulated daily ET0, well watered lysimeter experiment were carried out on turf grass. Hourly ET0 and 24-hour accumulated daily ET0 were calculated based on hourly meteorological data and evaluated by using daily observed grass evapotranspiration derived from well watered lysimeter experiment. There was a certain difference between ET0 calculated by FAO56 Penman-Monteith equation and that by ASCE Penman-Monteith equation, and the difference was more significant when the ET0 values were relative higher. Hourly ET0 were tested to be lower for FAO56 Penman-Monteith equation than for ASCE Penman-Monteith equation in daytime, but just reversed at night. That was ascribed to the difference in Cd values. It was a pity to say that the equation mended by ASCE could not result in improvement in hourly ET0 calculation, when the 24-hour accumulated daily ET0 were compared with observed daily grass evapotranspiration. Daily ET0 calculated by Penman-Monteith equation based on meteorological data at daily time step were test to be the most consistent with that by lysimeter observed. Further evaluation of either FAO56 Penman-Monteith equation or ASCE Penman-Monteith equation was urgent in China, based on hourly or long series daily observed grass evapotranspiration.

引用

页码：32 / 37

页数：5

共 21 条

[1]

Doorenbos J., Pruitt W.O., Crop Water Requirements, (1975)

[2]

pp. 50-128, (1995)

[3]

Allen R.G., Pereira L.S., Raes D., Et al., Crop Evapotranspiration-Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirement, (1998)

[4]

Hossein D., Tahei Y., Velu R., Assessment of evapotranspiration estimation models for use in semi-arid environments, Agricultural Water Management, 64, 2, pp. 91-106, (2004)

[5]

Trajkovic S., Hargreaves versus Penman-Monteith under Humid Conditions, Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, ASCE, 133, 1, pp. 38-42, (2007)

[6]

Liu Y., Preira L.S., Teixira J.L., Update definition and computation of reference evapotranspiration comparison with former method, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 28, 6, pp. 27-33, (1997)

[7]

The ASCE Standardized Reference Evapotranspiration Equation, (2005)

[8]

Itenfisu D., Elliott R.L., Allen R.G., Et al., Comparison of reference evapotranspiration calculations as a part of the ASCE standardization effort, Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, ASCE, 129, 6, pp. 440-448, (2003)

[9]

Su C., Chen Y., Xu B., Recent development and universality evaluation of ET<sub>0</sub> calculation formulas, Advances in Water Science, 19, 1, pp. 129-136, (2008)

[10]

Du Y., Liu Z., Zhang Y., Evaluation of two reference crop evapotranspiration calculation methods, Journal of Henan Agricultural University, 35, 1, pp. 57-61, (2001)

← 1 2 3 →