Containing reasoning and its conservative extensionsin description logic FL0

被引:0
|
作者
机构
[1] College of Science, Guizhou University of Engineering Science, Bijie, 551700, Guizhou
[2] College of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, 541004, Guangxi
[3] College of Lijiang, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, 541004, Guangxi
来源
| 2015年 / Science Press卷 / 52期
关键词
Canonical model; Conservative expansion; Contain reasoning; Description logic; Ontology;
D O I
10.7544/issn1000-1239.2015.20131135
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Conservative extension is an important property in the mathematical logic. Its notion plays acentral role in ontology design and integration. It can be used to formalize ontology refinements, safe mergings of two ontologies, and independent modules inside an ontology. Regarding reasoning support, the most basic task is to decide whether one ontology is a conservative extension of another. If this is not the case, the evolution of the ontology with the original ontology will not be able to maintain the same logical conclusion. In recent years, lightweight description logics (DLs) have gained increasing popularity. In fact ontology is definitely the structured knowledge base in description logic. As we know, knowledge is not always the same, so it needs to be extended as long as new improvement appears in this field. It is concerned that whether it is consistent with the primitive one after extension. The conservative extension of FL0 system is analyzed based on Lutzs' work. Firstly the FL0 canonical model is constructed and the inclusion inference is reduced to the simulations between two FL0 canonical models. The complexity is pointed out to be polynomial based on the fact that the canonical models' largest simulation is polynomial. After that the FL0 conservative extension algorithm is presented and its complexity is proved to be exponential. ©, 2015, Science Press. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 228
页数:7
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Tang S., Cai Z., Wang J., Et al., Finite basis in gfp-models of description logic FLE, Journal of Computer Research and Development, 47, 9, pp. 1514-1521, (2010)
  • [2] Jiang Y., Tang S., Wang J., Et al., Computing most specific concept in description logic with n-ary existential quantifier, Journal of Computer Research and Development, 46, 6, pp. 979-987, (2009)
  • [3] Antoniou G., Kehagias A., On the refinement of ontologiess, International Journal of Intelligent System, 15, 7, pp. 623-632, (2000)
  • [4] Lutz C., Wolter F., Deciding inseparability and conservative extensions in the description logic EL, Journal of Symbolic Computation, 45, 2, pp. 194-228, (2010)
  • [5] Ghilardi S., Lutz C., Wolter F., Did I damage my ontology?, Proc of 2006 Int Conf on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pp. 187-197, (2006)
  • [6] Lutz C., Walther D., Wolter F., Conservative extensions in expressive description logics, Proc of the 20th Int Conf on Artifical Intelligence, pp. 453-458, (2007)
  • [7] Lutz C., Wolter F., Deciding inseparability and conservative extensions in the description logic EL, Journal of Symbolic Computation, 45, 2, pp. 194-228, (2010)
  • [8] Nie D., Conservative extensionsin description logic VL, (2012)
  • [9] Kang W., Conservative extensions in the lightweight description logic FL, (2012)
  • [10] Zhang W., Hou J., Cao F., Et al., Computing the least common subsumer in description logic FLEN, Journal of Computer Research and Development, 47, 6, pp. 1053-1059, (2010)