Research of the Balance Stiffness on the Output Impact of a Force-measurement System

被引：0

作者：

Lyu J. ^{[1
]}

Chen G. ^{[1
]}

Zhu Q. ^{[1
]}

Zhao X. ^{[1
]}

Wu B. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Tribology Research Inst., School of Mechanical Eng., Southwest Jiaotong Univ., Chengdu

来源：

Gongcheng Kexue Yu Jishu/Advanced Engineering Sciences | 2020年 / 52卷 / 02期

关键词：

Force-measurement balance; Force-measurement system; Inertia compensation; Measurement accuracy; Stiffness;

D O I：

10.15961/j.jsuese.201801324

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

The measurement result of the force-measurement system (FMS) will be greatly impacted by the stiffness of the force balance when it is used in an impulse combustion wind tunnel. To study this issue, firstly, the FMS is simplified and its dynamic motion equation is given. Secondly, the stiffness matrixes and modal parameters of the FMS-A, FMS-B, and FMS-C with different stiffness are acquired by the virtual calibration and modal analysis. Thirdly, the transient simulations of FMS-A, FMS-B, and FMS-C are conducted to acquire their responses. The results show that the mean measurement accuracies before and after the inertia compensation are higher than 93.00% and 99.60%, respectively. The mean outputs of FMS-A, FMS-B, and FMS-C are close to each other when the same loads are applied on the test model. This proves that the stiffness of the force balance has little influence on the mean measurement accuracies of the FMS. In addition, the transient output histories are approximately consistent with the inputs. The transient measurement accuracies of FMS-A in drag, lift, and pitching moment are higher than 85.13%, 80.14%, and 68.40%, respectively. They are higher than 85.90%, 83.48%, and 69.90% as to FMS-B, respectively and they are higher than 85.91%, 89.05%, and 74.67% as to FMS-C, respectively. This shows that, on a certain range, the transient measurement accuracies are improved with the increase of the stiffness of the force balance. © 2020, Editorial Department of Advanced Engineering Sciences. All right reserved.

引用

页码：161 / 170

页数：9

共 12 条

[1]

Tanno H., Komuro T., Sato K., Et al., Aerodynamic force measurement technique with accelerometers in the impulsive facility HIEST, Shock Waves, 1, pp. 471-476, (2009)

[2]

Singh P., Menezes V., Irimpan K.J., Et al., Impulse force balance for ultrashort duration hypersonic test facilities, Shock and Vibration, (2015)

[3]

Singh P., Trivedi S., Menezes V., Et al., Dynamic calibration and validation of an accelerometer force balance for hypersonic lifting models, The Scientific World Journal, 7, pp. 1-8, (2014)

[4]

Trivedi S., Menezes V., Measurement of yew,pitch and side-force on a lifting model in a hypersonic shock tunnel, Measurement, 45, pp. 1755-1764, (2012)

[5]

Robinson M., Hannemann K., Short duration force meas-urements in impulse facilities, Aerodynamic Measurement Technology and Ground Testing Conference, (2006)

[6]

Smith A.L., Mee D.J., Daniel W.J., Et al., Design,modelling and analysis of a six component force balance for hypervelocity wind tunnel testing, Computers and Structures, 79, 11, pp. 1077-1088, (2001)

[7]

Collopy A.X., Lee S., Marineau E.C., Development of dynamic force measurement capabilities at AEDC Tunnel 9, Aerospace Sciences Meeting, (2014)

[8]

Wang Y., Liu Y., Luo C., Et al., Force measurement using strain-gauge balance in a shock tunnel with long test dura-tion, Review of Scientific Instruments, 87, 5, pp. 1-8, (2016)

[9]

He W., Tong Z., Li H., Investigation of thrust balance for the single module scramjet, Journal of Aerospace Power, 25, 10, pp. 2285-2289, (2010)

[10]

Lv J., Zhang X., Chen G., Et al., Transient research of force measuring balance to impulse combustion wind tunnel based on inertia compensation, Journal of Vibration and Shock, 37, 2, pp. 216-222, (2018)

← 1 2 →