A Balanced Scorecard approach to performance management for a national R&D programme in Korea

被引：1
|
作者：
Lee, Jae-Keun [1 ]
Hong, Pilky [2 ]
机构：
[1] E-commerce Department, Semyung University, Jecheon-city, Chungbuk 390-711
[2] Department of Business Administration, Seoul Digital University, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul 135-895
来源：
International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning | 2009年 / 5卷 / 04期
关键词：
Balanced Scorecard; BSC; National R&D programme; Performance management; Planning; Technology;
D O I：
10.1504/IJTIP.2009.029376
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
To increase national competitiveness, Korean Government devotes herself to nation-wide expansion of technological capability. As a result, the National R&D Programme has increased in size as well as in number. The Korean government introduced a performance-based budgeting regime to reinforce the 'accountability' in public sector, emphasising its conformance by managing strategically a programme to its mission. A Balanced Scorecard (BSC) approach is suggested as an elaborate tool for measuring its performance. However, the premise and logic of ordinary BSC cannot be directly applied to a programme. This study discusses necessary conditions for proper application of BSC into it, and suggests a BSC variant. Copyright © 2009 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码：373 / 385
页数：12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Meeting the challenge in performance management: the diffusion and implementation of the balanced scorecard in Chinese hospitals
    Gao, Tian
    Gurd, Bruce
    HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, 2015, 30 (02) : 234 - 241
  • [32] DASHBOARD VISUALISATION FOR HEALTHCARE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT: BALANCED SCORECARD METRICS
    Victor, Stephen
    Farooq, Ayesha
    ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF HEALTH MANAGEMENT, 2021, 16 (02): : 28 - 38
  • [33] EXPLORING THE DETERMINANTS OF GOVERNMENT-SPONSORED R&D PERFORMANCE IN KOREA
    Ryu, Youngsoo
    Choi, Sang Ok
    PUBLIC PERFORMANCE & MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2015, 39 (02) : 337 - 357
  • [34] Performance Management in Public Organizations With Balanced Scorecard: Dimensions And Indicators
    Usta, Aydin
    AMME IDARESI DERGISI, 2012, 45 (01): : 99 - 120
  • [35] Balanced Scorecard - Strategic Management Tool of Performance in Public Institutions
    Gabriel, Talaghir Laurentiu
    Victoria, Gheonea
    Mihaela, Iconomescu Teodora
    SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC GROWTH, EDUCATION EXCELLENCE, AND INNOVATION MANAGEMENT THROUGH VISION 2020, VOLS I-VII, 2017, : 3372 - 3382
  • [36] Enterprise Knowledge Management Performance Evaluation Based on Balanced Scorecard
    Zhou Zhiying
    Jiang Yu
    Qiu Lingzhen
    PROCEEDINGS OF HANGZHOU CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT OF TECHNOLOGY (MOT 2008), 2008, : 481 - 487
  • [37] MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT BALANCED SCORECARD APPROACH FOR URBAN TRANSPORT FLEETS
    Macian, Vicente
    Tormos, Bernardo
    Herrero, Jescis
    EKSPLOATACJA I NIEZAWODNOSC-MAINTENANCE AND RELIABILITY, 2019, 21 (02): : 226 - 236
  • [38] Using the Balanced Scorecard Approach to Appraise the Performance of Cloud Computing
    Udoh, Emmanuel
    Patterson, Beth
    Cordle, Scott
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GRID AND HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING, 2016, 8 (01) : 50 - 57
  • [39] Evaluating the sustainable performance of corporate boards: the balanced scorecard approach
    Aly, Ahmed Hussein
    Mansour, Mohamed Elsayed
    MANAGERIAL AUDITING JOURNAL, 2017, 32 (02) : 167 - 195
  • [40] Study on Performance Management of Enterprise R&D Staff
    Cai, Houqing
    Qin, Xincai
    2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, INNOVATION MANAGEMENT AND INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, VOL 3, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 563 - 566
12345