Seismic performance assessment of reinforced concrete coupled walls reinforced with different types of shape memory alloys

被引:0
|
作者
Feli, Shahryar [1 ]
Marnani, Jafar Asgari [1 ]
Ghasemi, Abbas [1 ]
Nejad, Soheil Monajemi [1 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Civil & Earth Resources Engn, Cent Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran
来源
关键词
coupled wall; CuAlMn; FeNCATB; NiTi; OpenSees; residual displacements; CIVIL ENGINEERING STRUCTURES;
D O I
10.1002/tal.2185
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Novel earthquake-resistant materials are of interest to the academic community because they have the potential to reduce seismic residual displacements and, by extension, maintenance costs. Smart materials and technologies have enhanced the seismic response of reinforced concrete (RC) buildings, but the effect of these advancements on issues that arise after earthquakes in RC-coupled walls has not yet been investigated. This research scrutinizes the seismic performance of RC-linked walls reinforced with NiTi, FeNCATB, and CuAlMn superelastic shape memory rebar in the boundary regions. As a part of the case study, three RC-linked wall systems with four, eight, and twelve stories were adopted. The highest critical values for the inter-story drift ratio (IDR) and the residual inter-story drift ratio (RIDR) were obtained through the OpenSees program. According to the results, RIDR markedly reduces whenever concerns about the quake's aftermath are highlighted. In accordance with findings, among the whole adopted shape memory alloy (SMA) types in this research, the RC-coupled wall based on Cu demonstrates superior results concerning RIDR and performs adequately regarding the restoring effect. As a result, seismically involved areas exposed to significant ground motions are typically recommended to use Cu-based SMA material.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Seismic Fragility Assessment of Concrete Bridge Pier Reinforced with Superelastic Shape Memory Alloy
    Billah, A. H. M. Muntasir
    Alam, M. Shahria
    EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2015, 31 (03) : 1515 - 1541
  • [32] Analytical model for seismic simulation of reinforced concrete coupled shear walls
    Ding, Ran
    Tao, Mu-Xuan
    Nie, Xin
    Mo, Y. L.
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2018, 168 : 819 - 837
  • [33] Shake Table Seismic Performance Assessment of Lightly Reinforced Concrete Block Shear Walls
    Mojiri, Saeid
    El-Dakhakhni, Wael W.
    Tait, Michael J.
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 141 (02)
  • [34] Seismic Performance Limitations and Detailing of Slender Reinforced Concrete Walls
    Segura, Christopher L., Jr.
    Wallace, John W.
    ACI STRUCTURAL JOURNAL, 2018, 115 (03) : 849 - 859
  • [35] Seismic Retrofitting of Reinforced-Concrete Coupled Shear Walls: A Review
    Afefy, Hamdy M.
    PRACTICE PERIODICAL ON STRUCTURAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 25 (03)
  • [36] Seismic Performance of 2D Regular Reinforced Concrete Frame Buildings Strengthened by Using Shape Memory Alloys
    Chayma, El Mtili
    Loubna, Hessissen
    Abdellatif, Khamlichi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING RESEARCH IN AFRICA, 2024, 72 : 135 - 154
  • [37] Seismic performance of shape memory alloy reinforced concrete moment frames under sequential seismic hazard
    Abraik, Emad
    STRUCTURES, 2020, 26 : 311 - 326
  • [38] Seismic performance of concrete columns reinforced with hybrid shape memory alloy (SMA) and fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) bars
    Billah, A. H. M. Muntasir
    Alam, M. Shahria
    CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2012, 28 (01) : 730 - 742
  • [39] Mechanical model for seismic response assessment of lightly reinforced concrete walls
    Brunesi, E.
    Nascimbene, R.
    Pavese, A.
    EARTHQUAKES AND STRUCTURES, 2016, 11 (03) : 461 - 481
  • [40] Seismic performance assessment of lightly reinforced concrete columns
    Wibowo, A.
    Wilson, J. L.
    Fardipour, M.
    Lam, N. T. K.
    Rodsin, K.
    Lukkunaprasit, P.
    Gad, E. F.
    INCORPORATING SUSTAINABLE PRACTICE IN MECHANICS OF STRUCTURES AND MATERIALS, 2011, : 341 - 346