A platform for visualizing and experimenting with measures of semantic similarity in ontologies and concept maps

被引:0
作者
School of Geography, Geology and Environmental Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand [1 ]
不详 [2 ]
机构
[1] School of Geography, Geology and Environmental Science, University of Auckland, Auckland
[2] Department of Geography, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
来源
Trans. GIS | 2008年 / 6卷 / 713-732期
关键词
Application programming interface; Concept mapping; GI Science; Ontology; Schema mediation; Semantic similarity;
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-9671.2008.01124.x
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This article describes research in the ongoing search for better semantic similarity tools: such methods are important when attempting to reconcile or integrate knowledge, or knowledge-related resources such as ontologies and database schemas. We describe an extensible, open platform for experimenting with different measures of similarity for ontologies and concept maps. The platform is based around three different types of similarity, that we ground in cognitive principles and provide a taxonomy and structure by which new similarity methods can be integrated and used. The platform supports a variety of specific similarity methods, to which researchers can add others of their own. It also provides flexible ways to combine the results from multiple methods, and some graphic tools for visualizing and communicating multi-part similarity scores. Details of the system, which forms part of the ConceptVista open codebase, are described, along with associated details of the interfaces by which users can add new methods, choose which methods are used and select how multiple similarity scores are aggregated. We offer this as a community resource, since many similarity methods have been proposed but there is still much confusion about which one(s) might work well for different geographical problems; hence a test environment that all can access and extend would seem to be of practical use. We also provide some examples of the platform in use. © 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:713 / 732
页数:19
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Agarwal P., Ontological considerations in GIScience, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 19, pp. 501-536, (2005)
  • [2] Bloehdorn S., Haase P., Sure Y., Voelker J., Ontology evolution, Semantic Web Technologies: Trends and Research in Ontology-based Systems, pp. 51-70, (2006)
  • [3] Braspenning P., A semiotic perspective on agent technology, Proceedings of the KaHo St.-Lieven Symposium on Intelligent Agents in Software Engineering for Planning, (2000)
  • [4] Brodaric B., Geo-Pragmatics for the geospatial semantic web, Transactions in GIS, 11, pp. 453-477, (2007)
  • [5] Brodaric B., Gahegan M., Experiments to examine situated geoscientific concepts, Spatial Cognition and Computation Journal, 7, pp. 61-95, (2007)
  • [6] Clancey W., Situated cognition: How representations are created and given meaning, Lessons from Learning, pp. 231-242, (1994)
  • [7] Davies J., Studer R., Warren P., Semantic Web Technologies: Trends and Research in Ontology-based Systems, (2006)
  • [8] Fonseca F., Camara G., Monteiro A.M., A framework for measuring the interoperability of geo-ontologies, Spatial Cognition and Computation, 6, pp. 309-331, (2006)
  • [9] Frodeman R., Geo-Logic: Breaking Ground Between Philosophy and the Earth Sciences, (2003)
  • [10] Gahegan M., Pike W., A situated knowledge representation of geographical information, Transactions in GIS, 10, pp. 727-749, (2006)