Evaluation of volumetric threshold shear strain of gravel-sand mixtures in centrifuge model tests

被引:0
|
作者
Dejphumee, Siwadol [1 ]
Sasanakul, Inthuorn [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Carolina, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 300 Main St, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
关键词
Gravelly soil; Threshold shear strain; Centrifuge modeling; Soil composition; Volume change; Pore water pressure; LIQUEFACTION; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.109109
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
A series of dynamic centrifuge modeling tests were conducted to evaluate the volumetric threshold shear strain of loose gravel-sand mixtures composed of various ratios of gravel and sand by weight. The maximum and minimum void ratios of the mixtures were evaluated, and the optimum packing condition was determined when the mixture contained approximately 60-70 % gravel by weight. A total of six centrifuge modeling tests were performed at 50-g centrifuge gravitational acceleration. Each centrifuge model was subjected to six shaking events consisting of uniform sinusoidal motions with various amplitudes and numbers of cycles. During the entire duration of the test, the development of excess pore water pressure and settlement was monitored. Empirical relationships of pore water pressure ratio and shear strains were developed for these mixtures. The development of excess pore water pressure in the mixtures with greater than 60 % gravel exhibits transient behavior, while residual excess pore water pressure was observed in the mixtures with less than 60 % gravel. Based on the results, the volumetric threshold strain evaluated from the generation of pore water pressure and volume change during shaking is similar. The values were found to be in a range of 0.03-0.10 % and are influenced by soil composition. The threshold strain increases as the amount of gravel in the soil mixture increases.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The applicability of microbially induced calcite precipitation (MICP) for internal erosion control in gravel-sand mixtures
    Jiang, N. -J.
    Soga, K.
    GEOTECHNIQUE, 2017, 67 (01): : 42 - 55
  • [22] Volumetric threshold shear strain for cyclic settlement
    Hsu, CC
    Vucetic, M
    JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2004, 130 (01) : 58 - 70
  • [23] The direct shear strength and dilatancy of sand-gravel mixtures
    Simoni A.
    Houlsby G.T.
    Geotechnical & Geological Engineering, 2006, 24 (3): : 523 - 549
  • [24] Centrifuge model tests on mooring lines in sand
    Bang, S
    Cho, Y
    Kim, YS
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 38TH SYMPOSIUM ENGINEERING GEOLOGY AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING: BRIDGE BETWEEN THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2003, : 41 - 50
  • [25] Brief note on the influence of shape and percentage of gravel on the shear strength of sand and gravel mixtures
    Yagiz S.
    Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2001, 60 (04) : 321 - 323
  • [26] Gravel content effect on site response of sand-like gravelly soil deposits by centrifuge model tests
    Xia, Peng
    Zhou, Yan-Guo
    Chen, Yun-Min
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2025, 190
  • [27] Research on the relative density of sand and gravel filled underwater based on geotechnical centrifuge tests
    Liu, Xiancai
    Li, Bo
    Shen, Liqun
    Jiang, Fengming
    Shi, Xiaoshi
    Chen, Lei
    Yantu Gongcheng Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46 : 239 - 243
  • [28] Small-Strain Shear Modulus and Damping Ratio of Sand-Rubber and Gravel-Rubber Mixtures
    Anastasiadis, Anastasios
    Senetakis, Kostas
    Pitilakis, Kyriazis
    GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2012, 30 (02) : 363 - 382
  • [29] Small-Strain Shear Modulus and Damping Ratio of Sand-Rubber and Gravel-Rubber Mixtures
    Anastasios Anastasiadis
    Kostas Senetakis
    Kyriazis Pitilakis
    Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2012, 30 (2) : 363 - 382
  • [30] Stress-strain characteristics of rubber-sand mixtures in united triaxial shear and simple shear tests
    Liu Fang-cheng
    Zhang Yong-fu
    Ren Dong-bin
    ROCK AND SOIL MECHANICS, 2016, 37 (10) : 2769 - +