Assessment of different semi-active control strategies on the performance of off-road vehicle suspension systems

被引:7
作者
Faris W.F. [1 ]
BenLahcene Z. [1 ]
Ihsan S.I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Departments of Mechanical Engineering and Mechatronics Engineering, College of Engineering, International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM), Jalan Gombak
关键词
Ground-hook; Half-vehicle model; Hybrid; Passive suspension system; Ride comfort; Semi-active system; Skyhook;
D O I
10.1504/IJVSMT.2010.037129
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper deals with dynamics and control policies analysis of semi-active suspension systems for off-road vehicles. Three configurations of these vehicles; two-axle, three-axle and four-axle have been studied and their performances are compared. The application of several control policies of semi-active suspension system, namely skyhook; ground-hook and hybrid controls have been analysed and compared with passive systems. The results show that the hybrid control policy yields better comfort than a passive suspension, without reducing the road-holding quality or increasing the suspension displacement. The hybrid control policy is also shown to be a better compromise between comfort, road-holding and suspension displacement than the skyhook and ground-hook control policies. Skyhook control generally improves sprung mass responses while at the same time increasing unsprung mass responses. On the other hand, ground-hook control generally improves unsprung mass responses at the expense of the sprung mass responses. Results show an improvement in ride comfort and vehicle handling using four-axle over three-axle and two-axle when emphasis is placed on the response of the vehicle body acceleration, suspension and tyre deflection. Copyright © 2010 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:254 / 271
页数:17
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]  
Barak P., Passive Versus Active and Semi-Active Suspension from Theory to Application in North American Industry, (1992)
[2]  
Crosby M.J., Karnopp D.C., The active damper, The Shock and Vibration Bulletin, 43, (1973)
[3]  
EI-Demerdash E.M.A.R., Ride Performance Analysis of Multi-Axle Combat Vehicle, (2004)
[4]  
Faris W.F., Ihsan S.I., Ahmadian M., Transient and steady state dynamic analysis of passive and semiactive suspension systems using half car model, International Journal of Modelling, Identification and Control (IJMIC), 6, 1, pp. 62-71, (2009)
[5]  
Faris W.F., Ihsan S.I., Ahmadian M., A comparative ride performance and dynamic analysis of passive and semiactive suspension systems based on different vehicle models, International Journal of Vehicle Noise &Vibration (IJVNV), 5, 1-2, pp. 116-140, (2009)
[6]  
Karnopp M.J.C., Harwood R.A., Vibration control using semi-active force generators, Journal of Engineering for Industry, 96, pp. 619-626, (1974)
[7]  
Koo J.H., Goncalves F.D., Ahmadian M., Investigation of the response time of magnetorheological fluid dampers, Proceedings of SPIE 2004 Smart Structures and Materials/NDE, pp. 63-71, (2004)
[8]  
Michele I., Patrizio T., Mauro M., Development of a heavy truck semi-active suspension control, Control Engineering Practice, 14, pp. 305-312, (2006)