AI literacy for ethical use of chatbot: Will students accept AI ethics?

被引:0
作者
Kajiwara, Yusuke [1 ]
Kawabata, Kouhei [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Production Systems Engineering and Sciences, Komatsu University, Shichomachi Nu1-3, Ishikawa, Komatsu
来源
Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence | 2024年 / 6卷
关键词
AI literacy; Chatbot; Ethics; Large language models; Secondary education; Technology acceptance;
D O I
10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100251
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In AI literacy education, there are few examples of education based on AI ethical principles, and limited knowledge exists regarding curriculum design that incorporates AI ethical principles and its effects. Therefore, in this study, we propose a curriculum that teaches the ethical use of large language models (LLM) such as ChatGPT and verify its impact on educational effectiveness and technology acceptance among students aged 12 to 24. The validation results show that the proposed curriculum particularly contributes to the understanding of LLM concepts and their ethical use in decision support. We also demonstrate that experience using ChatGPT influences the level of understanding of ethical usage. Additionally, students aged 12 to 18 may actively adopt ChatGPT responses in decision support, and careful consideration is needed when using LLMs in the 12- to 18-year-old age group. Using technology acceptance model, AI ethical principles were also examined to determine technology acceptance, and it was found that usefulness, justice and fairness, privacy, and data protection directly impact attitudes toward ChatGPT. It has also become clear that students feel uneasy about using their personal information for learning ChatGPT, even if they have consented to the use of their personal information. This result suggests that AI developers and providers need to handle personal information carefully to foster a positive AI attitude. © 2024 The Authors
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 75 条
  • [1] Achiam J., Adler S., Agarwal S., Ahmad L., Akkaya I., Aleman F.L., McGrew B., GPT-4 technical report, (2023)
  • [2] Al Darayseh A., Acceptance of artificial intelligence in teaching science: Science teachers' perspective, Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, (2023)
  • [3] AlAfnan M.A., Dishari S., Jovic M., Lomidze K., Chatgpt as an educational tool: Opportunities, challenges, and recommendations for communication, business writing, and composition courses, Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Technology, 3, 2, pp. 60-68, (2023)
  • [4] Arrieta A.B., Diaz-Rodriguez N., Del Ser J., Bennetot A., Tabik S., Barbado A., Herrera F., Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI, Information Fusion, 58, pp. 82-115, (2020)
  • [5] Beauchamp T.L., Childress J.F., Principles of biomedical ethics, (2001)
  • [6] Buchanan J., Hill S., Shapoval O., ChatGPT hallucinates non-existent citations: Evidence from economics, The American Economist, (2023)
  • [7] Burgsteiner H., Kandlhofer M., Steinbauer G., Irobot: Teaching the basics of artificial intelligence in high schools, Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, 30, (2016)
  • [8] Cooper G., Examining science education in chatgpt: An exploratory study of generative artificial intelligence, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32, 3, pp. 444-452, (2023)
  • [9] Cox C., Tzoc E., ChatGPT: Implications for academic libraries, College & Research Libraries News, 84, 3, (2023)
  • [10] Cugurullo F., Acheampong R.A., Fear of AI: An inquiry into the adoption of autonomous cars in spite of fear, and a theoretical framework for the study of artificial intelligence technology acceptance, AI & Society, pp. 1-16, (2023)