Unboxing maturity models: A set-theoretic perspective on e-Government configurations over time

被引:0
作者
Iannacci, F. [1 ]
Karanasios, S. [2 ]
Viscusi, G. [3 ]
Mcmanus, R. [4 ]
Rupietta, C. [5 ,6 ]
Tan, C. W. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sussex, Dept Management, Business Sch, Falmer, England
[2] Univ Queensland, Univ Queensland Business Sch, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Linkoping Univ, Dept Management & Engn IEI, Informat Syst & Digitalizat INDIG, Linkoping, Sweden
[4] Canterbury Christ Church Univ, Christ Church Business Sch, Canterbury, England
[5] Queens Univ Belfast, Queens Business Sch, Belfast, North Ireland
[6] Univ Wuppertal, Jackstadt Ctr Entrepreneurship & Innovat Res, Wuppertal, Germany
[7] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Fac Business, Dept Management & Mkt, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
e -Government Maturity; Change Models; Theoretical Multiplicity; Configurational Theorizing; fsQCA; QUALITATIVE COMPARATIVE-ANALYSIS; INFORMATION; EVOLUTION; ICT; DETERMINANTS; PERFORMANCE; GUIDELINES; INNOVATION; ECONOMIES; DIFFUSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jsis.2024.101874
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This study conceptualizes e-Government maturity from the theoretical lens of strategic change. Drawing on a multiplicity of theories, it undertakes a fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis of the drivers of e-Government maturity over the 2010-2020 decade. It bypasses partially conflicting findings about the contribution of human capital to high levels of e-Government maturity by showcasing instead two configurations of conditions where human capital investments become a non-trivial necessary condition over time. Theoretical, methodological, and practical implications are discussed by zooming in on the configurational patterns emerging over time and, by extension, refining the notion of 'turning point' discussed in the literature.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 100 条
  • [1] Ten Misunderstandings about Maturity Models
    Andersen, Kim Normann
    Lee, Jungwoo
    Mettler, Tobias
    Moon, M. Jae
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 21ST ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DIGITAL GOVERNMENT RESEARCH, DGO 2020, 2020, : 261 - 266
  • [2] E-government maturity models: Extension of the Layne and Lee model
    Andersen, Kim Viborg
    Henriksen, Helle Zinner
    [J]. GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2006, 23 (02) : 236 - 248
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2014, United Nations E-Government Survey 2014
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2010, United Nations E-Government Survey 2010. Leveraging E-Government at a Time of Financial and Economic Crisis
  • [5] [Anonymous], United Nations. (2010). American Society for Public Administration. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. E-Government Survey 2010. Disponivel em: https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2010. Acesso em: 12 nov. 2016.
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2020, The state of broadband: tackling digital inequalities: a decade for action
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2018, UN E GOVT SURVEY 201
  • [8] Business model configurations and performance: A qualitative comparative analysis in Formula One racing, 2005-2013
    Aversa, Paolo
    Furnari, Santi
    Haefliger, Stefan
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE, 2015, 24 (03) : 655 - 676
  • [9] Bélanger F, 2012, J ASSOC INF SYST, V13, P363
  • [10] MEDIA COVERAGE OF FIRMS IN THE PRESENCE OF MULTIPLE SIGNALS: A CONFIGURATIONAL APPROACH
    Bettinazzi, Emanuele L. M.
    Jacqueminet, Anne
    Neumann, Kerstin
    Snoeren, Peter
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2024, 67 (01) : 150 - 177