A study on polyethylene stresses in mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using explicit finite element analysis

被引:0
作者
机构
[1] Center for Product Design and Manufacturing, Indian Institute of Science
[2] HOSMAT Hospital, Bangalore
来源
Deb, A. (adeb@cpdm.iisc.ernet.in) | 1600年 / Begell House Inc.卷 / 23期
关键词
Contact stress; Finite element analysis; Fixed-bearing; Gait cycle; Mobile-bearing; Polyethylene (PE) insert; Total knee arthroplasty (TKA);
D O I
10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2013008440
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty designs were thought to be associated with lesser stresses on the polyethylene (PE) insert as compared to fixed-bearing designs. The wear rate of the PE liner was felt to be less in the mobile-bearing knees due to the decrease in the stresses. However, a reevaluation of the biomechanics of the mobile-bearing design is necessary due to the recent clinical reports on the long-term outcome of mobile-bearing knees which have not demonstrated any significant benefit in terms of implant survival and polyethylene wear rate. In this explicit finite element analysis of mobile-bearing and fixedbearing knee designs using LS-DYNA, no significant differences have been found in the maximal stresses in the superior (articulating) surface of the PE insert in mobile- and fixedbearing designs. On the inferior surface of the PE insert, the peak stresses were nearly 30% higher in the mobile-bearing compared with the fixed-bearing design. Thus, contrary to earlier expectations, mobile-bearing designs may be associated with higher overall PE stresses and wear than the fixed-bearing designs. Further research is necessary to minimize the wear rate of the PE insert in mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. © 2014 by Begell House, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 283
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Sharkey P.F., Hozack W.J., Rothman R.H., Shastri S., Jacoby S.M., Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today?, Clin Orthop Relat Res., 404, pp. 7-13, (2002)
[2]  
Dennis D.A., Komistek R.D., Mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: Design factors in minimizing wear, Clin Orthop Relat Res., 452, pp. 70-77, (2006)
[3]  
Matsuda S., White S.E., Williams II V.G., McCarthy D.S., Whiteside L.A., Contact stress analysis in meniscal bearing total knee arthroplasty, J Arthroplasty, 13, 6, pp. 699-706, (1998)
[4]  
Dennis D.A., Advantage of mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty, US Musculoskeletal Rev., pp. 43-47, (2007)
[5]  
McEwen H.M.J., Barnett P.I., Bell C.J., Farrar R., Auger D.D., Stone M.H., Fisher J., The influence of design, materials and kinematics on the in vitro wear of total knee replacements, J Biomech., 38, pp. 357-365, (2005)
[6]  
Engh G.A., Zimmerman R.L., Parks N.L., Engh C.A., Analysis of wear in retrieved mobile and fixed bearing knee inserts, J Arthroplasty., 24, 6 SUPPL., pp. 28-32, (2009)
[7]  
Huang C.H., Ma H.M., Liau J.J., Ho F.Y., Cheng C.K., Late dislocation of rotating platform in New Jersey Low-Contact Stress knee prosthesis, Clin Orthop, 405, pp. 189-194, (2002)
[8]  
Buechel F.F., Pappas M.J., Ten-year evaluation of meniscal bearings, Orthop Clin North Am., 20, 2, pp. 147-177, (1989)
[9]  
Sorrells R.B., Primary knee arthroplasty: Long-term outcomes, the rotating platform mobile bearing TKA, Orthopedics, 19, pp. 793-796, (1996)
[10]  
Bert J.M., Dislocation/subluxation of meniscal bearing elements after New Jersey Low-Contact Stress total knee arthroplasty, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 254, pp. 211-215, (1990)