Hysteretic behavior of buckling-restrained steel plate shear wall with partitioned restraining panels

被引：0

作者：

Zhong H. ^{[1
]}

Hou J. ^{[1
]}

Guo L. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] School of Civil Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin

来源：

Jianzhu Jiegou Xuebao/Journal of Building Structures | 2021年 / 42卷

关键词：

Buckling-restrained steel plate shear wall; Finite element analysis; Hysteretic behavior; Low cyclic loading test; Partitioned restraining panel;

D O I：

10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2021.S2.0048

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Concrete cover plate used in buckling-restrained steel plate shear wall (BRSPSW) is difficult for transportation and installation. This problem can be solved by dividing the single cover plate into multi-plates. To study the seismic behavior of BRSPSW with partitioned restraining panels, two 1: 3 scaled BRSPSW specimens with different partition modes were designed and manufactured. The hysteretic behavior of the specimens was tested under the cyclic load. The effect of partitioned restraining panels on the bearing capacity, stiffness, ductility and energy dissipation ability was investigated. The non-linear finite element analysis (FEA) software ABAQUS was applied to develop the model and test results were used for validation. The experimental and FEA results show that BRSPSWs with partitioned restraining panels have excellent hysteretic behavior. Compared to unstiffened steel plate shear walls, BRSPSW with partitioned restraining panels have a higher bearing capacity and energy dissipated ability. The partition of restraining panels reduces the bearing capacity and energy dissipation ability of BRSPSW slightly, but improves the ductility. When the height-to-thickness ratio of unstiffened zone is large, the pure shear field of the unstiffened zone transforms into tension field, which results in the decrease of the shear bearing capacity of the shear wall. And it may also cause the premature damage of the unstiffened zone. A maximum height-to-thickness ratio of 20 is recommended for the unstiffened zone of BRSPSWs with partitioned restraining panels. © 2021, Editorial Office of Journal of Building Structures. All right reserved.

引用

页码：410 / 418

页数：8

共 15 条

[1]

GUO Yanlin, DONG Quanli, Research and application of steel plate shear wall in high-rise buildings, Steel Construction, 20, 1, pp. 1-6, (2005)

[2]

THORBURN L J, KULAK G L, MONTGOMERY C J., Analysis of steel plate shear walls, pp. 1-15, (1983)

[3]

TIMLER P A, KULAK G L., Experimental study of steel plate shear walls: Structural Engineering Report. No.114, (1983)

[4]

DRIVER R G, KULAK G L, KENNEDY D J L, Et al., Cyclic test of four-story steel plate shear wall, Journal of Structural Engineering, 124, 2, pp. 112-120, (1998)

[5]

GUO Yanlin, ZHOU Ming, Categorization and performance of steel plate shear wall, Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering, 26, 3, pp. 1-13, (2009)

[6]

ABOLHASSAN Astaneh-Asl, Seismic behavior and design of composite steel plate shear walls, (2001)

[7]

GUO Lanhui, LI Ran, RONG Qin, Et al., Cyclic behavior of spsw and cspsw in composite frame, Thin-Walled Structures, 51, 2, pp. 39-52, (2012)

[8]

GUO Zhen, YUAN Yingshu, Experimental study of steel plate composite shear wall units under cyclic load, International Journal of Steel Structures, 15, 3, pp. 515-525, (2015)

[9]

DU Peng, Investigation of mechanical behavior and design approach of steel plate shear walls with sliding lateral constraints, pp. 22-26, (2017)

[10]

WANG Yuhang, GU Chaowei, TANG Qi, Et al., Experimental study on cyclic pure shear behavior of hat-section cold-formed steel member buckling-restrained steel plate shear walls without effect of frame, Engineering Structures, 201, (2019)

← 1 2 →