Electrical Bioimpedance-Based Monitoring of Intracochlear Tissue Changes After Cochlear Implantation

被引:0
作者
Sijgers, Leanne [1 ]
Geys, Marlies [1 ]
Geissler, Gunnar [2 ]
Boyle, Patrick [2 ]
Huber, Alexander [1 ]
Pfiffner, Flurin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Univ Hosp Zurich, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Adv Bion GmbH, European Res Ctr, D-30625 Hannover, Germany
关键词
digital biomarkers; remote hearing healthcare; cochlear implant; neuroprosthetics; hearing technology; auditory rehabilitation; HEARING PRESERVATION; IMPEDANCE CHANGES; AUDITORY-NERVE; IN-VITRO; STIMULATION; ELECTRODES; MODEL; ELECTROCOCHLEOGRAPHY; OUTCOMES; HEALTH;
D O I
10.3390/s24237570
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Background: This study examined electrical bioimpedance as a biomarker for intracochlear tissue changes after cochlear implant surgery, comparing monopolar, three-point, and four-point impedance measurements over time and evaluating different measurement systems and approaches. Methods: Impedance measurements were obtained from 21 participants during surgery and at four postoperative stages. Monopolar impedances were recorded using the Bionic Ear Data Collection System (BEDCS) and the Active Insertion Monitoring (AIM) system. Three- and four-point impedances were recorded directly using BEDCS, and indirect three-point impedances were additionally derived from Electrical Field Imaging matrices recorded using BEDCS or AIM. Results: There was an 11% relative error between monopolar measurements from BEDCS and AIM and a 25% discrepancy between direct and indirect three-point measurements. Despite this, direct and indirect measurements from both systems were useful for tracking postoperative impedance shifts. Three- and four-point measurements showed a strong relationship both during and after surgery. Our results suggest that three- and four-point measurements are more specific than monopolar impedances in capturing localized tissue changes. Conclusions: Three- and four-point impedance measurements are potential markers of intracochlear tissue changes over time. While direct three-point impedance measurements offer higher accuracy, indirect measurements provide a feasible alternative for monitoring intracochlear changes in clinical settings lacking the option of direct measurements.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Changes in the Thresholds of the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential with Waveform Analyses After Cochlear Implantation
    Hong, Jong Chul
    Yu, Tai Hyun
    Lee, Kang Dae
    Heo, Seung Duk
    Kang, Myung Koo
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ADVANCED OTOLOGY, 2010, 6 (03) : 347 - 352
  • [32] Impedance Changes and Fibrous Tissue Growth after Cochlear Implantation Are Correlated and Can Be Reduced Using a Dexamethasone Eluting Electrode
    Wilk, Maciej
    Hessler, Roland
    Mugridge, Kenneth
    Jolly, Claude
    Fehr, Michael
    Lenarz, Thomas
    Scheper, Verena
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (02):
  • [33] Four-point Impedance Changes in the Early Post-Operative Period After Cochlear Implantation
    Razmovski, Tayla
    Bester, Christofer
    Collins, Aaron
    O'Leary, Stephen J.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2022, 43 (07) : E730 - E737
  • [34] Predictors of Short-Term Changes in Quality of Life after Cochlear Implantation
    Walia, Amit
    Bao, James
    Dwyer, Noel
    Rathgeb, Susan
    Chen, Stephanie
    Shew, Matthew A.
    Durakovic, Nedim
    Herzog, Jacques A.
    Buchman, Craig A.
    Wick, Cameron C.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2023, 44 (03) : E146 - E154
  • [35] Intraoperative Use of Electrical Stapedius Reflex Testing for Cochlear Nerve Monitoring During Simultaneous Translabyrinthine Resection of Vestibular Schwannoma and Cochlear Implantation
    Kocharyan, Armine
    Daher, Ghazal S.
    Nassiri, Ashley M.
    Khandalavala, Karl R.
    Saoji, Aniket A.
    Van Gompel, Jamie J.
    Carlson, Matthew L.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2022, 43 (04) : 506 - 511
  • [36] Anwendung der extra- und intracochleären Elektrocochleographie während und nach der CochleaimplantationApplication of extra- and intracochlear electrocochleography during and after cochlear implantation
    Adrian Dalbert
    Stefan Weder
    HNO, 2025, 73 (1) : 14 - 21
  • [37] Plasticity after pediatric cochlear implantation: Implication from changes in peripheral plasma level of BDNF and auditory nerve responses
    Alemi, Razieh
    Zarandy, Masoud Motassadi
    Joghataei, Mohammad Taghi
    Eftekharian, Ali
    Zarrindast, Mohammad Reza
    Vousooghi, Nasim
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2018, 105 : 103 - 110
  • [38] Algorithm-Based Hearing and Speech Therapy Rehabilitation after Cochlear Implantation
    Eichler, Theda
    Roetz, Wiebke
    Kayser, Christoph
    Broehl, Felix
    Roemer, Michael
    Witteborg, Arne Henning
    Kummert, Franz
    Sandmeier, Tobias
    Schulte, Christoph
    Stolz, Patricia
    Meyer, Katharina
    Sudhoff, Holger
    Todt, Ingo
    BRAIN SCIENCES, 2022, 12 (05)
  • [39] Cognitive Functions in Adults Receiving Cochlear Implants: Predictors of Speech Recognition and Changes After Implantation
    Zhan, Kevin Y.
    Lewis, Jessica H.
    Vasil, Kara J.
    Tamati, Terrin N.
    Harris, Michael S.
    Pisoni, David B.
    Kronenberger, William G.
    Ray, Christin
    Moberly, Aaron C.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2020, 41 (03) : E322 - E329
  • [40] Speech Perception Changes in the Acoustically Aided, Nonimplanted Ear after Cochlear Implantation: A Multicenter Study
    Svirsky, Mario A.
    Neuman, Arlene C.
    Neukam, Jonathan D.
    Lavender, Annette
    Miller, Margaret K.
    Aaron, Ksenia A.
    Skarzynski, Piotr H.
    Cywka, Katarzyna B.
    Skarzynski, Henryk
    Truy, Eric
    Seldran, Fabien
    Hermann, Ruben
    Govaerts, Paul
    De Ceulaer, Geert
    Bergeron, Francois
    Hotton, Matthieu
    Moran, Michelle
    Dowell, Richard C.
    Schmidt Goffi-Gomez, Maria Valeria
    de Matos Magalhaes, Ana Tereza
    Santarelli, Rosamaria
    Scimemi, Pietro
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (06) : 1 - 15