The fuzzy graph model for conflict resolution considering power asymmetry based on social trust network

被引:3
作者
Liu, Peide [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Xueke [1 ]
Wang, Xue [1 ]
Wang, Peng [1 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Management Sci & Engn, Jinan 250014, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ Finance & Econ, Shandong Key Lab Blockchain Finance, Jinan 250014, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Graph model for conflict resolution (GMCR); Power asymmetry; Fuzzy preferences; Social trust networks (STN); GROUP DECISION-MAKING; OPINION DYNAMICS; CONSENSUS MODEL; PREFERENCE; UNCERTAINTY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ins.2024.121442
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Conflicts are widespread in all spheres of society, and power asymmetries between conflicting actors are becoming more pronounced. However, the underlying causes of this asymmetry are often overlooked. To objectively reveal the fundamental reasons for power asymmetry, this paper utilizes Social Trust Networks (STN) to calculate decision-makers' (DMs) weights. To further investigate the complex phenomenon of power asymmetry and accurately describe the inherent fuzziness in DMs' subjective judgments, two multiple decision-makers (multi-DMs) power asymmetry models based on fuzzy preferences are constructed: one with a leader, a subordinate leader, and a follower, and the other with a leader and two followers. In response to the issue of neglecting power intensity differences in previous research, this paper provided an in-depth discussion of the effects of different degrees of power on the adjustment of followers' preferences. On this basis, the stability definitions were extended to fuzzy power asymmetry conditions. Finally, this paper presented a case study on business operation conflicts in commercial banks and drew conclusions based on the analysis.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Implementation of single-valued neutrosophic soft hypergraphs on human nervous system
    Akram, Muhammad
    Nawaz, Hafiza Saba
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW, 2023, 56 (02) : 1387 - 1425
  • [2] Intuitionistic fuzzy hypergraphs with applications
    Akram, Muhammad
    Dudek, Wieslaw A.
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2013, 218 : 182 - 193
  • [3] Bipolar fuzzy graphs
    Akram, Muhammad
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2011, 181 (24) : 5548 - 5564
  • [4] Environment management policy implementation for sustainable industrial production under power asymmetry in the graph model
    Ali, Sharafat
    Xu, Haiyan
    Yang, Kong
    Solangi, Yasir Ahmed
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2022, 29 : 636 - 648
  • [5] Modeling Fuzzy and Interval Fuzzy Preferences Within a Graph Model Framework
    Bashar, M. Abul
    Obeidi, Amer
    Kilgour, D. Marc
    Hipel, Keith W.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2016, 24 (04) : 765 - 778
  • [6] The graph model for conflict resolution with information-gap uncertainty in preferences
    Ben-Haim, Y
    Hipel, KW
    [J]. APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTATION, 2002, 126 (2-3) : 319 - 340
  • [7] Chen L., 2024, Chin. J. Manage. Sci., DOI [10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x2021.2205, DOI 10.16381/J.CNKI.ISSN1003-207X2021.2205]
  • [8] Analysis of power asymmetry conflict based on fuzzy options graph models
    Chen, Lu
    Pedrycz, Witold
    Xu, Haiyan
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2024, 284
  • [9] Conflict analysis based on a novel three-way decisions graph model for conflict resolution method under hesitant fuzzy environment
    Chen, Lu
    Xu, Haiyan
    Pedrycz, Witold
    [J]. INFORMATION FUSION, 2023, 100
  • [10] Consensus reaching in social network group decision making: Research paradigms and challenges
    Dong, Yucheng
    Zha, Quanbo
    Zhang, Hengjie
    Kou, Gang
    Fujita, Hamido
    Chiclana, Francisco
    Herrera-Viedma, Enrique
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2018, 162 : 3 - 13