Effects of different sallow water acoustic channel models on error-correction code performance analysis

被引:0
作者
机构
[1] Key Lab of Underwater Acoustic Communication and Marine Information Tech of the Ministry of Educ, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, Fujian
[2] College of Ocean and Earth Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, Fujian
来源
Chen, Y.-G. (chenyougan@xmu.edu.cn) | 1600年 / China Ordnance Industry Corporation卷 / 34期
关键词
Channel error-correction code; Channel model; Communication technology; LDPC code; Underwater acoustic communications;
D O I
10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2013.11.010
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
There have been no standard statistical channel models for the underwater acoustic (UWA) channel as a result of the complex and variability of UWA channel. Different UWA channel models are required for different purposes during the UWA communication research. It is important to evaluate the effect of different UWA channel modeling on research conclusions. From the perspective of channel error-correction code, the effects of different channel models on channel error-correction code (taking LDPC codes as an example) design are investigated by analyzing several UWA channel models, including time-invariance model, time-variance model and quasi-static fading model adopted in UWA communication simulation. The simulation results show that the optimized designs of coding parameters are almost the same, although different channel modeling usually requires different signal-to-noise ratio for decoding. The sea test data are adopted to further verify the conclusions.
引用
收藏
页码:1404 / 1411
页数:7
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
Xu X., Zhou S., Morozov A.K., Et al., Per-survivor processing for underwater acoustic communications with direct-sequence spread spectrum, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133, 5, pp. 2746-2754, (2013)
[2]  
Xu X., Wang Z., Zhou S., Et al., Parameterizing both path amplitude and delay variations of underwater acoustic channels for block decoding of orthogonal frequency division multiplexing, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131, 6, pp. 4672-4679, (2012)
[3]  
Stojanovic M., On the relationship between capacity and distance in an underwater acoustic communication channel, ACM Sigmobile Mobile Computing and Communications Review, 11, 4, pp. 34-43, (2007)
[4]  
Zhang R.-H., Research progress on China ocean acoustics, Physics, 23, 9, pp. 513-518, (1994)
[5]  
Liu S.-X., High-efficiency error correcting code techniques for shallow water acoustic channels, (2009)
[6]  
Ai Y.-H., Hui J.-Y., Gao J., Study of simulation of underwater acoustic channel correlated equalizer, Acta Acustica, 24, 6, pp. 589-597, (1999)
[7]  
Wang Z., Zhou S., Preisig J.C., Et al., Clustered adaptation for estimation of time-varying underwater acoustic channels, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 60, 6, pp. 3079-3091, (2012)
[8]  
Li G.-L., Research of phase-coherent communications and adaptive equalization for UWA channels, (2007)
[9]  
Vajapeyam M., Vedantam S., Mitra U., Et al., Distributed space-time cooperative schemes for underwater acoustic communications, IEEE Transactions on Oceanic Engineering, 33, 4, pp. 489-501, (2008)