Making sense of opportunities in building material production

被引:8
作者
Isaksson, Raine [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Engineering Sciences, Uppsala University
关键词
Opportunity Study; Process dimension; Process model; Process performance; Process-based systems; System focus;
D O I
10.1108/TQM-06-2015-0073
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Breakthrough improvement requires management decisions, which indicates that making sense of existing opportunities is important. This is a particular challenge when the improvement is a possibility and not a problem. The purpose of this paper is to propose the practice of doing an Opportunity Study as the way to create a sense of management urgency for realising dormant possibilities. Design/methodology/approach: A process-based Opportunity Study is presented consisting of a Diagnosing-Analysing-Solving (DAS) approach. Benchmarks are defined and compared with the actual performance resulting in a quantifiable improvement potential (D). Main causes are analysed (A), which leads to proposed solutions (S). The Opportunity Study practice is applied to a cement milling process, a cement plant and a supply network for cement-based building products. Findings: Results indicate that applying DAS methodology highlights realisable opportunities in all of the studied cases. This seems to be a necessary, but not sufficient criterion to create a sense of urgency for facts based change. Research limitations/implications: The results indicate that there is need for further research for looking at the process of sense making and to what extent facts alone can drive change initiatives. Practical implications: Results indicate that by a simple review, focusing on what a system can do instead of which the problems are, valuable opportunities for improvement could be detected. Originality/value: The paper highlights the value of focusing on opportunities. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
引用
收藏
页码:781 / 797
页数:16
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Argyris C., Overcoming Organisational Defences - Facilitating Organisational Learning, (1990)
  • [2] Bergman B., Klefsjo B., Quality from Customer Needs to Customer Satisfaction, (2010)
  • [3] Engineeringintro, Water to Cement Ratio, (2015)
  • [4] Garvare R., Isaksson R., Organisational sustainability management through minimised business excellence models, The Third International Working Conference-TQM - Advanced and Intelligent Approaches, pp. 33-40, (2005)
  • [5] Hallencreutz J., Under the Skin of Change - Meanings, Models and Management, (2012)
  • [6] Isaksson R., Total Quality Management for Sustainable Development - Focus on Processes, (2004)
  • [7] Isaksson R., Total quality management for sustainable development - Process based system models, Business Process Management Journal, 12, 5, pp. 632-645, (2006)
  • [8] Isaksson R., Johansson P., Fischer K., Detecting supply chain innovation potential for sustainable development, Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 3, pp. 425-442, (2010)
  • [9] Isaksson R., Garvare R., Johnson M., The crippled bottom line - Measuring and managing sustainability, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 64, 3, pp. 334-355, (2015)
  • [10] Isaksson R., Idman O., Lenhav O., Satterman J., Visualising improvement and innovation potential - The case of sustainable building in Dar es Salaam, The International Conference of Quality and Service Sciences, 15th QMOD, (2012)