Stochastic consensus for uncertain multiple attribute group decision-making problem in belief distribution environment

被引:0
作者
Dai, Xianchao [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Li, Hao [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhou, Ligang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wu, Qun [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Univ, Sch Big Data & Stat, Hefei 230601, Anhui, Peoples R China
[2] Anhui Univ, Sch Math Sci, Hefei 230601, Anhui, Peoples R China
[3] Anhui Univ, Anhui Univ Ctr Appl Math, Hefei 230601, Anhui, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Multiple attribute decision-making; Consensus; Belief distribution; Group decision making; ACCEPTABILITY ANALYSIS; MINIMUM ADJUSTMENT; FEEDBACK MECHANISM; MODEL; SMAA; COST; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1016/j.asoc.2024.112495
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In the realm of uncertain multiple attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) problems, existing research often focuses on the development of consensus-enhancing algorithms grounded in optimization models. However, this paper takes a stochastic perspective, thoroughly considering the impact of uncertainty on decision-making. And a novel stochastic method to model group consensus is introduced with the listed three components: (1) the concept of stochastic rank analysis based on stochastic belief distribution (BD) is given to measure the uncertainty degree in the original BD matrix, which is then used to assign weights to decision makers (DMs). (2) in uncertain environments, to ensure the effectiveness of consensus from a probabilistic perspective, the stochastic consensus index is proposed by taking both the advantages of the Jensen-Shannon (JS) distance and the hesitant distance between stochastic BDs. Then, the expected acceptable group consensus index is further provided to measure the consensus of original preferences among the group, and (3) finally, to deal with the issue of no consensus information, an optimization model is constructed aimed at achieving an acceptable consensus that can generate recommendation advice for DMs, facilitating the attainment of a consensus. The effectiveness of the proposed method is exemplified through two case studies: purchase of new energy vehicles (NEVs) and a postgraduate interview scenario. Furthermore, sensitivity analysis and comparative analysis are presented to better prove its advantages.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条