Sustainable development footprint: A framework for assessing sustainable development risks and opportunities in time and space

被引：5

作者：

Amekudzi, Adjo ^{[1
]}

Khayesi, Meleckidzedeck ^{[2
]}

Khisty, C. Jotin ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 788 Atlantic Drive, Atlanta, 30332-0355, GA

[2] Injuries and Violence Prevention Department, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia, Geneva 27

[3] Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Illinois Institute of Technology, 3201 S. Dearborn Street, Chicago, 60616, IL

来源：

International Journal of Sustainable Development | 2015年 / 18卷 / 1-2期

关键词：

Capital asset management; Opportunity; Risk; Sustainable development;

D O I：

10.1504/IJSD.2015.066786

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

This paper elaborates a framework, the sustainable development footprint, that can be used to assess progress in sustainable development in space and time. The framework views sustainability as consisting of the entire stock of its capital (natural and derived) and the rate of use of this stock to develop human (or other types) capital relative to the rates of regeneration of its capital stocks. The framework discusses three key forms of capital: economic, natural and human. The paper uses the framework to analyse variation in sustainable development status among 35 countries. The results show that sustainable development status, in particular its opportunities and risks, varies in relation to dynamics in economic, environmental and human capital. This framework provides a tool that nations, cities and other administrative units can use to evaluate their sustainability progress from time to time, in order to direct their resources and development in a manner that is supportive of the goals of sustainable development. The framework and illustration are potentially useful to decision makers and researchers making efforts to maximise the opportunities and minimise the risks as they advance sustainable development in international, national and local contexts. Copyright © 2015 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.

引用

页码：9 / 40

页数：31

共 49 条

[1]

Amekudzi A., Fisher J.M., Khayesi M., Khisty C.J., Asima S.O., Risk-theoretical foundations for settingsustainable development priorities: A global perspective, Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, (2011)

[2]

Amekudzi A., Khisty C.J., Khayesi M., Using the sustainability footprint model to assess development impacts of transportation systems, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 43, 3, pp. 339-348, (2009)

[3]

American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Board of Directors Meeting Minutes, Approval: Definition of Sustainability, (2009)

[4]

Bagheri A., Hjorth P., Planning for sustainable development: A paradigm shift towards a process-based approach, Sustainable Development, 15, 2, pp. 83-96, (2007)

[5]

Barrella E., Amekudzi A., Backcasting for sustainable transportation planning, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2242, pp. 29-36, (2011)

[6]

Bond R., Curran J., Kirkpatrick C., Lee N., Francis P., Integrated impact assessment for sustainable development: A case study approach, World Development, 29, 6, pp. 1011-1024, (2001)

[7]

Boulanger P., Brechet T., Models for policy-making in sustainable development: The state of the art and perspectives for research, Ecological Economics, 55, 3, pp. 337-350, (2005)

[8]

Carson R., Silent Spring, (1962)

[9]

Daly H.E., Economics in a full world, Scientific American Special Issue: Crossroads for Planet Earth, (2005)

[10]

Dietz S., Neumayer E., Weak and strong sustainability in the SEEA: Concepts and measurement, Ecological Economics, 61, 4, pp. 617-626, (2007)

← 1 2 3 4 5 →