Environmental regulations and firms' trade-offs between innovations: Empirical evidence from the quasi-experiment in China

被引:5
作者
Yu, Yang [1 ]
Liu, Yituan [1 ]
机构
[1] Jinan Univ, Sch Econ, 601 West Huangpu Ave, Guangzhou 510630, Peoples R China
关键词
Environmental regulations; Low-carbon city; Green innovation; Digital innovation; Event studies; DIGITAL INNOVATION; GREEN; PROTECTION; COMPANIES; POLICIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122819
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper uses firm-level panel data to study the quasi-experiment of China's low carbon city (LCC) pilots and to estimate the dynamic impact of environmental regulations on firms' trade-offs between green innovation and digital innovation. The results indicate that environmental regulations lead to an increase in firms' green innovation in the short run and promote firms' digital transformation in the long run. Moreover, the key factors influencing firms' trade-offs are their size and the pollution levels of their primary businesses, highlighting the importance of both capability and immediacy for firms when making decisions. Furthermore, the event study shows that environmental regulations initially impact firms' profits in heavily polluting industries in the short run. However, environmental regulations can gradually enhance those profits in the long run by reducing marginal costs and upgrading industrial structures in treated regions. This paper provides insights for a deeper understanding of firms' heterogeneous choices and dynamic effects of innovation behaviors.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 69 条
[51]   Digital innovation strategy: A framework for diagnosing and improving digital product and service innovation [J].
Nylen, Daniel ;
Holmstrom, Jonny .
BUSINESS HORIZONS, 2015, 58 (01) :57-67
[52]   Can digital transformation promote enterprise performance?-From the perspective of public policy and innovation [J].
Peng, Yongzhang ;
Tao, Changqi .
JOURNAL OF INNOVATION & KNOWLEDGE, 2022, 7 (03)
[53]  
Poarnik M., 2023, Journal of Human, Earth, and Future, V4, P316, DOI [https://doi.org/10.28991/HEF-2023-04-03-05, DOI 10.28991/HEF-2023-04-03-05, 10.28991/HEF-2023-04-03-05]
[54]   TOWARD A NEW CONCEPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT-COMPETITIVENESS RELATIONSHIP [J].
PORTER, ME ;
VANDERLINDE, C .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 1995, 9 (04) :97-118
[55]   AMERICA GREEN STRATEGY [J].
PORTER, ME .
SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, 1991, 264 (04) :168-168
[56]   Missing women and the price of tea in China: The effect of sex-specific earnings on sex imbalance [J].
Qian, Nancy .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2008, 123 (03) :1251-1285
[57]   Environmental regulations, innovation and firm performance: A revisit of the Porter hypothesis [J].
Ramanathan, Ramakrishnan ;
He, Qile ;
Black, Andrew ;
Ghobadian, Abby ;
Gallear, David .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 155 :79-92
[58]   Environmental Regulation and Enterprise Innovation: A Review [J].
Shao, Shuai ;
Hu, Zhigao ;
Cao, Jianhua ;
Yang, Lili ;
Guan, Dabo .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 29 (03) :1465-1478
[59]   Estimating dynamic treatment effects in event studies with heterogeneous treatment effects [J].
Sun, Liyang ;
Abraham, Sarah .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2021, 225 (02) :175-199
[60]   Does environmental regulation affect analyst forecast bias? Evidence from China's Low-Carbon Pilot Policy [J].
Sun, Yuying ;
Wu, Kai ;
Liu, Sihui ;
Hong, Yongmiao .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 353