Health Care Engineering, Part II: Research and Development in the Health Care Environment

被引:0
作者
机构
[1] Carleton University, University of Ottawa, Ottawa
来源
Frize, M. | 1600年 / Morgan and Claypool Publishers卷 / 51期
关键词
clinical trials; electronic medical records; information technologies; knowledge management process; medical errors and adverse events; usability studies;
D O I
10.2200/S00540ED1V01Y201310BME051
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Download Free Sample Part II of Health Care Engineering begins with statistics on the occurrence of medical errors and adverse events, and includes some technological solutions. A chapter on electronic medical records follows. The knowledge management process divided into four steps is described; this includes a discussion on data acquisition, storage, and retrieval. The next two chapters discuss the other three steps of the knowledge management process (knowledge discovery, knowledge translation, knowledge integration and sharing). The last chapter briefly discusses usability studies and clinical trials. This two-part book consolidates material that supports courses on technology development and management issues in health care institutions. It can be useful for anyone involved in design, development, or research, whether in industry, hospitals, or government. Table of Contents: Preface/Adverse Events, Medical Errors, and the Role of Information Technology in Reducing Them/The Electronic Medical Record (EMR): Design, Safety, and Meaningful Use/Knowledge Management (KM) in a Clinical Environment: Data Acquisition, Storage, and Retrieval/Knowledge Discovery (KD): Data Analysis and Data Mining Tools/Knowledge Translation (KT), Integration, and Sharing (KIS) in a Clinical Environment/Clinical Trials and Usability Studies in a Medical Environment. © 2014 by Morgan and Claypool.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 83
页数:82
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Basili V.R., Weiss D.M., A Methodology for Collecting Valid Software Engineering Data, IEEE Trans. Software Eng., SE-10, pp. 728-738, (1984)
[2]  
Faulkner L., Beyond the five-user assumption: Benefits of increased sample sizes in usability testing, Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 35, 3, pp. 379-383, (2003)
[3]  
Frize M., Yang L., Walker R.C., O'Connor A.M., Conceptual framework of knowledge management for ethical decision-making support in neonatal intensive care, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, 9, 2, pp. 205-215, (2005)
[4]  
Frize M., Ethics for Bioengineers. Morgan & Claypool. Synthesis Lectures on Biomedical Engineering, 2011
[5]  
Hussain A., Ferneley E., Usability Metric for Mobile Application: A Goal Question Metric (GQM) Approach, Proc. Intern. Conf. on Information Integration and Web-based Applications and Services, 567-570, (2008)
[6]  
Lewis J.R., Sample Sizes for Usability Studies: Additional Considerations, J. Bus. Tech. Commun., 26, pp. 171-201, (2012)
[7]  
Nielsen J., Usability Engineering., pp. 115-148, (1994)
[8]  
Nielsen J., Molich R., Heuristic Evaluation of User Interfaces, Proc ACM CHI'90 Conf. (Seattle, WA, 1-5 April), pp. 249-256, (1990)
[9]  
NIH-Observational Studies (N.D.)
[10]  
NIH-Clinical Trials (N.D.), (2013)