Net-zero farming: Trigeneration with carbon capture and storage

被引:0
作者
Tang, Zhaozhao [1 ,2 ]
Vallabh, Davina [3 ]
Wang, Yaodong [3 ]
Huang, Ye [4 ]
Han, Jing-Cheng [1 ]
Zhou, Yang [1 ]
Wang, Linlin [1 ]
Ahmad, Muhammad [1 ]
Yousaf, Maryam [1 ]
Wang, Yuchen [1 ]
Huang, Yuefei [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Shenzhen Univ, Coll Chem & Environm Engn, Water Sci & Environm Engn Res Ctr, Shenzhen 518060, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Hydraul Engn, State Key Lab Hydrosci & Hydraul Engn, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Durham, Dept Engn, Durham DH1 3LE, England
[4] Ulster Univ, Belfast Sch Architecture & Built Environm, Newtownabbey BT37 0QB, Antrim, North Ireland
[5] Qinghai Univ, Sch Civil Engn & Water Resources, Lab Ecol Protect & High Qual Dev Upper Yellow Rive, Xining 810016, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Anaerobic digestion; Biogas; Carbon capture; ECLIPSE; Trigeneration; ANAEROBIC CO-DIGESTION; AMMONIA-WATER; BIOGAS; DAIRY; EMISSIONS; SLUDGE; MANURE; WASTE; POWER;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2024.121898
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Aiming to achieve net-zero farming, this study explores the potential of anaerobic digestion of various biowastes to produce biogas for meeting the energy demands of a dairy farm, including electricity, heating, and cooling. Two options were investigated: Option 1 focuses solely on meeting the farm's energy demand, while Option 2 focuses on a big system that utilizes all available biowastes to produce biogas, with surplus electricity sold back to grid. These options were modelled using ECLIPSE software and evaluated in terms of practicality, environmental impact, and economic viability. Option 2, employing trigeneration, achieved an overall efficiency of 80.0 %, significantly higher than Option 1's 48.4 %. However, the efficiencies of the combined heat and power (CHP) system for Option 1 and 2 were 62.2 % and 81.1 %, respectively, both higher than their corresponding trigeneration. Option 2 also produced a greater annual carbon dioxide offset of 4206 Ton CO2-eq compared to 299 Ton CO2-eq for Option 1 by leveraging digestive fertilizers and carbon capture and storage technology (CCS). Finally, it was found that the payback period for Option 1 was projected at 11 years while Option 2 would require 12 years, with anticipated profits of 124,900 pound and 891,900 pound for Options 1 and 2, respectively.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
AGreatE, 2022, Commercial battery energy storage systems-ready to install
[2]   Biogas from anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and primary sludge for cogeneration of power and heat [J].
Aguilar, Marcelo Calispa ;
Wang, Yao Dong ;
Roskilly, Tony ;
Pathare, Pankaj B. ;
Lamidi, Rasaq O. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 142 :70-76
[3]   Evaluating greenhouse gas emissions from dairy manure management practices using survey data and lifecycle tools [J].
Aguirre-Villegas, Horacio A. ;
Larson, Rebecca A. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 143 :169-179
[4]   Agricultural use of digestate for horticultural crop production and improvement of soil properties [J].
Alburquerque, J. A. ;
de la Fuente, C. ;
Campoy, M. ;
Carrasco, L. ;
Najera, I. ;
Baixauli, C. ;
Caravaca, F. ;
Roldan, A. ;
Cegarra, J. ;
Bernal, M. P. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2012, 43 :119-128
[5]  
Alibaba.com, 2024, Puxin 20ft complete bio gas plant bio digestor
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2024, Biogenic CO2 from the biogas industry
[7]  
[Anonymous], Smart export guarantee (SEG)'
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2022, LEVELIZED COST ENERG
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2024, Mueller HiPerform E-star condensing unit-dairy farm
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Global Costs of Carbon Capture and Storage