Spatial field shifts in ocean acoustic environmental sensitivity analysis

被引：0

作者：

Dosso, Stan E. ^{[1
]}

Morley, Michael G. ^{[1
]}

Giles, Peter M. ^{[2
]}

Brooke, Gary H. ^{[2
]}

McCammon, Diana F. ^{[3
]}

Pecknold, Sean ^{[4
]}

Hines, Paul C. ^{[4
]}

机构：

[1] School of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8W 3P6, Canada

[2] General Dynamics Canada, 3785 Richmond Road, Ottawa, ON K2H 5B7, Canada

[3] McCammon Acoustical Consulting, 475 Baseline Rd., Waterville, NS B0P 1V0, Canada

[4] Defence Research and Development Canada-Atlantic, Dartmouth, NS B2Y 3Z7, Canada

来源：

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America | 2007年 / 122卷 / 05期

关键词：

This article examines the effects of spatial field shifts in ocean acoustic environmental sensitivity analysis. Acoustic sensitivity studies are typically based on comparing acoustic fields computed for a reference environmental model and for a perturbed model in which one or more parameters have been changed. The perturbation to the acoustic field due to the perturbed environment generally includes a component representing a spatial shift of the field (i.e; local field structure remains coherent; but shifts in range and/or depth) and a component representing a change to the shifted field. Standard sensitivity measures based on acoustic perturbations at a fixed point can indicate high sensitivity in cases where the field structure changes very little; but is simply shifted by a small spatial offset; this can conflict with an intuitive understanding of sensitivity. This article defines and compares fixed-point and field-shift corrected sensitivity measures. The approaches are illustrated with examples of deterministic sensitivity (i.e; sensitivity to a specific environmental change) and stochastic sensitivity (sensitivity to environmental uncertainty) in range-independent and range-dependent environments. © 2007 Acoustical Society of America;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Journal article (JA)

引用

页码：2560 / 2570

共 50 条

[31] ANALYSIS OF THE ACOUSTIC FIELD
MERMOZ, H
JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE IV, 1992, 2 (C1): : 19 - 26
[32] ENVIRONMENTAL-EFFECTS ON ACOUSTIC MEASURES OF GLOBAL OCEAN WARMING
SEMTNER, AJ
CHERVIN, RM
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 1990, 95 (C8) : 12973 - +
[33] SPATIAL COHERENCE OF ACOUSTIC FIELD BACKSCATTERED BY TURBULENCE
PERONA, GE
PISANI, RU
TRANSACTIONS-AMERICAN GEOPHYSICAL UNION, 1976, 57 (09): : 658 - 658
[34] Spatial heterogeneity of temperature sensitivity of soil respiration: A global analysis of field observations
Li, Jinquan
Pei, Junmin
Pendall, Elise
Fang, Changming
Nie, Ming
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2020, 141
[35] Structure-modified influence on the interior sound field and acoustic shape sensitivity analysis
Wu, JH
Chen, HL
JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 2002, 251 (05) : 905 - 918
[36] Spatial Coherence Comparisons between the Acoustic Field and Its Frequency-Difference and Frequency-Sum Autoproducts in the Ocean
Joslyn, Nicholas J.
Douglass, Alexander S.
Dowling, David R.
ACOUSTICS, 2022, 4 (03): : 764 - 782
[37] Ocean Acoustic Tomography Using Travel-time Sensitivity Kernel
Huang, Ying
Zhao, Hangfang
Wang, Feiyi
OCEANS 2016 - SHANGHAI, 2016,
[38] Environmental predictability: a missing link in ocean acidification sensitivity research
Rojas, M.
Chan, K. Y. K.
INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY, 2021, 61 : E755 - E756
[39] Sensitivity analysis of spatial models
Lilburne, Linda
Tarantola, Stefano
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2009, 23 (02) : 151 - 168
[40] Tipping point analysis of ocean acoustic noise
Livina, Valerie N.
Brouwer, Albert
Harris, Peter
Wang, Lian
Sotirakopoulos, Kostas
Robinson, Stephen
NONLINEAR PROCESSES IN GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 25 (01) : 89 - 97

← 1 2 3 4 5 →