Spatial field shifts in ocean acoustic environmental sensitivity analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Dosso, Stan E. [1 ]
Morley, Michael G. [1 ]
Giles, Peter M. [2 ]
Brooke, Gary H. [2 ]
McCammon, Diana F. [3 ]
Pecknold, Sean [4 ]
Hines, Paul C. [4 ]
机构
[1] School of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8W 3P6, Canada
[2] General Dynamics Canada, 3785 Richmond Road, Ottawa, ON K2H 5B7, Canada
[3] McCammon Acoustical Consulting, 475 Baseline Rd., Waterville, NS B0P 1V0, Canada
[4] Defence Research and Development Canada-Atlantic, Dartmouth, NS B2Y 3Z7, Canada
来源
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America | 2007年 / 122卷 / 05期
关键词
This article examines the effects of spatial field shifts in ocean acoustic environmental sensitivity analysis. Acoustic sensitivity studies are typically based on comparing acoustic fields computed for a reference environmental model and for a perturbed model in which one or more parameters have been changed. The perturbation to the acoustic field due to the perturbed environment generally includes a component representing a spatial shift of the field (i.e; local field structure remains coherent; but shifts in range and/or depth) and a component representing a change to the shifted field. Standard sensitivity measures based on acoustic perturbations at a fixed point can indicate high sensitivity in cases where the field structure changes very little; but is simply shifted by a small spatial offset; this can conflict with an intuitive understanding of sensitivity. This article defines and compares fixed-point and field-shift corrected sensitivity measures. The approaches are illustrated with examples of deterministic sensitivity (i.e; sensitivity to a specific environmental change) and stochastic sensitivity (sensitivity to environmental uncertainty) in range-independent and range-dependent environments. © 2007 Acoustical Society of America;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Journal article (JA)
引用
收藏
页码:2560 / 2570
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Travel-time sensitivity kernels in ocean acoustic tomography
    Skarsoulis, EK
    Cornuelle, BD
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2004, 116 (01): : 227 - 238
  • [22] ANALYSIS OF ACOUSTIC SENSITIVITY IN RATS
    ROMANOVA, LG
    POLETAEVA, II
    REMUS, B
    ZHURNAL VYSSHEI NERVNOI DEYATELNOSTI IMENI I P PAVLOVA, 1976, 26 (04) : 772 - 777
  • [23] ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS OF OCEAN DUMPING
    COX, GV
    TOWNSEND, S
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1974, : 32 - 32
  • [24] Rapid changes in coastal ocean microbiomes uncoupled with shifts in environmental variables
    Gronniger, Jessica L.
    Wang, Zhao
    Brandt, Genevieve R.
    Ward, Christopher S.
    Tsementzi, Despina
    Mu, Han
    Gu, Junyao
    Johnson, Zackary I.
    Konstantinidis, Konstantinos T.
    Hunt, Dana E.
    ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2022, 24 (09) : 4167 - 4177
  • [25] OCEAN ACOUSTIC FIELD SIMULATIONS FOR MONITORING LARGE-SCALE OCEAN STRUCTURES
    SHANG, EC
    WANG, YY
    COMPUTER PHYSICS COMMUNICATIONS, 1991, 65 (1-3) : 238 - 245
  • [26] WAVE FIELD COMPUTATIONS ON THE INTERFACE - AN OCEAN ACOUSTIC MODEL
    LEE, D
    MCDANIEL, ST
    MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 1983, 4 (05): : 473 - 488
  • [27] STATISTICAL PROPERTIES OF THE ACOUSTIC AMBIENT NOISE FIELD OF THE OCEAN
    DZIUBA, VP
    ILIICHEV, VI
    SHCHUROV, VA
    DOKLADY AKADEMII NAUK SSSR, 1986, 291 (04): : 982 - 984
  • [28] Experimental ocean acoustic field moments versus predictions
    Ewart, T.E.
    Reynolds, S.A.
    Ocean Variability and Acoustic Propagation - Proc, 1991,
  • [29] Spatial diversity equalization for MIMO ocean acoustic communication channels
    Song, BG
    Ritcey, JA
    IEEE JOURNAL OF OCEANIC ENGINEERING, 1996, 21 (04) : 505 - 512
  • [30] BINAURAL SENSITIVITY TO DIRECTION CUE IN AN ACOUSTIC SPATIAL SENSOR
    YONEZAWA, Y
    ACUSTICA, 1986, 61 (02): : 140 - 144