Optimization of Multi-Fins FinFET Implemented on SOI Wafer Based on SiGe and Gaussian Process Regression

被引:0
作者
Yalung, Christofer N. [1 ]
Yamwong, Wittawat [2 ]
Tantraviwat, Doldet [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Chiang Mai Univ, Fac Sci, Philosophy Program Nanosci & Nanotechnol, Mat Sci Res Ctr,Int Program Interdisciplinary, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
[2] Natl Elect & Comp Technol Ctr NECTEC, Thai Microelect Ctr TMEC, Chachoengsao 24000, Thailand
[3] Chiang Mai Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Elect Engn, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
[4] Chiang Mai Univ, Fac Sci, Ctr Excellence Mat Sci & Technol, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
来源
IEEE ACCESS | 2024年 / 12卷
关键词
FinFETs; Silicon; Germanium; Optimization; Silicon germanium; Mathematical models; Support vector machines; Artificial neural networks; Logic gates; Predictive models; Gaussian processes; Machine learning; Tri-gate FinFET; multi-fins FinFET; optimization; SiGe mole fraction; surrogate optimization; Gaussian process regression; propagation delay; machine learning; DEVICE; PERFORMANCE; DESIGN; NUMBER; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3489727
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Despite advancements in mitigating the short channel effect using high-k materials, multi-gate structures, and silicon-germanium (SiGe) alloys in three-dimensional FinFETs, performance trade-offs remain. This study introduces a novel machine learning framework utilizing a Gaussian process regression model (GPRM) and surrogate optimization (SO) to optimize design parameters of n-type and p-type SiGeFinFETs. With this approach targeting switching ratio (SR), the optimal mole fractions of the n-type FinFET are Si0.7Ge0.3 for source extension (S-ext), Si0.2Ge0.8 for channel (L-g), and Si for drain extension (D-ext),achieving an SR of 6.9x10(9). For p-type FinFET, the optimal configuration is Si0.9Ge0.1 for Sext, and Si for L-g and D-ext with an SR of 5.81x10(7). The optimization of n-type and p-type multi-fin FinFETs(NmFinFET and PmFinFET) was also investigated, considering varied input parameters such as L-g, fin height(F-h), fin width (F-w), S-ext, D-ext, and the number of fins (numfin). The optimized devices for NmFinFET and PmFinFET, prioritizing speed, have the same dimensions: L-g = 10 nm, F-h = 42 nm,F-w = 10 nm, S-ext = 3 nm, D-ext = 4 nm, and numfin = 5. An inverter constructed using these optimized parameters showed a simulated propagation delay of 2 ps. This machine learning-driven approach demonstrates remarkable effectiveness in optimizing FinFET designs. The framework's ability to simultaneously optimize multiple objectives showcases its potential for advancing semiconductor device engineering.
引用
收藏
页码:163444 / 163451
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [31] Machine Learning-Based Device Modeling and Performance Optimization for FinFETs
    Zhang, Huifan
    Jing, Youliang
    Zhou, Pingqiang
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS II-EXPRESS BRIEFS, 2023, 70 (04) : 1585 - 1589
  • [32] Influence of fin number on hot-carrier injection stress induced degradation in bulk FinFETs
    Zhang, Wenqi
    Wang, Tzuo-Li
    Huang, Yan-Hua
    Cheng, Tsu-Ting
    Chen, Shih-Yao
    Li, Yi-Ying
    Hsu, Chun-Hsiang
    Lai, Chih-Jui
    Yeh, Wen-Kuan
    Yang, Yi-Lin
    [J]. MICROELECTRONICS RELIABILITY, 2016, 67 : 89 - 93