A socio-cognitive perspective of knowledge integration in digital innovation networks

被引:2
作者
McCarthy, Stephen [1 ]
O'Raghallaigh, Paidi [1 ]
Kelleher, Carol [2 ]
Adam, Frederic [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll Cork, Cork Univ Business Sch, Dept Business Informat Syst, Cork, Ireland
[2] Univ Coll Cork, Cork Univ Business Sch, Dept Management & Mkt, Cork, Ireland
[3] Univ Coll Cork, INFANT SFI Ctr, Cork, Ireland
基金
爱尔兰科学基金会;
关键词
Digital innovation networks; Knowledge boundaries; Socio-cognition; Boundary objects; Health information systems; Qualitative research; INFORMATION-SYSTEMS; BOUNDARY OBJECTS; MANAGEMENT-SYSTEMS; ENTREPRENEURSHIP; TECHNOLOGY; ECOLOGY; AGENDA; POWER; VIEW;
D O I
10.1016/j.jsis.2024.101871
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Digital innovation is a complex process in which actors seek to create new value pathways by combining digital resources in a layered modular architecture. While IS scholarship has a rich tradition of research on developing and implementing digital artefacts within intra-organisational contexts, our understanding of knowledge integration across distributed innovation networks is nascent and under-theorised. This is an important area of research given the rising importance of digital innovation networks and the challenges faced in integrating specialised knowledge, especially given the greater diversity, speed, reach, and scope made possible by digital technologies. Drawing on in-depth case study findings from a health IoT project involving multiple organisations and disciplines, we explore how knowledge is integrated across boundaries during the initiation stage of a digital innovation network. Our findings point to boundaries related to the digital platform's organising vision, resource allocation, delivery roadmap, technical architecture, and intellectual property, to name but a few challenges. We then reveal five socio-cognitive modes of knowledge integration which actors strategically enact to cross syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic boundaries: Signalling, Assembling, Contesting, Discounting, and Finalising. The choice of mode depends on the perceived knowledge status ('what they know') and social status ('who they are') of network actors, which highlight the salience of both social and cognitive dependencies for knowledge integration. We further discuss the contribution of design objects for overcoming differences and distinctions between specialist actors in a digital innovation network.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Digital entrepreneurship and indigenous value systems: An Ubuntu perspective [J].
Abubakre, Mumin ;
Faik, Isam ;
Mkansi, Marcia .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS JOURNAL, 2021, 31 (06) :838-862
[2]   Review:: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems:: Conceptual foundations and research issues [J].
Alavi, M ;
Leidner, DE .
MIS QUARTERLY, 2001, 25 (01) :107-136
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Flipping the Odds of Digital Transformation Success
[4]  
Avgerou C, 2007, MIS QUART, V31, P295
[5]   Digital "x"-Charting a Path for Digital-Themed Research [J].
Baiyere, Abayomi ;
Grover, Varun ;
Lyytinen, Kalle J. ;
Woerner, Stephanie ;
Gupta, Alok .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2023, 34 (02) :463-486
[6]   Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor [J].
Bechky, BA .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2003, 14 (03) :312-330
[7]   Wakes of innovation in project networks: The case of digital 3-D representations in architecture, engineering, and construction [J].
Boland, Richard J., Jr. ;
Lyytinen, Kalle ;
Yoo, Youngjin .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2007, 18 (04) :631-647
[8]   Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries [J].
Carlile, PR .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2004, 15 (05) :555-568
[9]   A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development [J].
Carlile, PR .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2002, 13 (04) :442-455
[10]   Agility in responding to disruptive digital innovation: Case study of an SME [J].
Chan, Calvin M. L. ;
Teoh, Say Yen ;
Yeow, Adrian ;
Pan, Gary .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS JOURNAL, 2019, 29 (02) :436-455