Determining dynamic load on a buried gas pipeline under mining machinery actions based on test and numerical simulation

被引:0
作者
机构
[1] School of Petroleum Engineering, Southwest Petroleum Univ., Chengdu
[2] College of Architecture and Environment, Sichuan Univ., Chengdu
来源
Xu, Tao-Long | 1600年 / Chinese Vibration Engineering Society卷 / 33期
关键词
Buried gas pipeline; Dynamic load; Dynamic test; Excavator; Numerical simulation;
D O I
10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2014.17.008
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In order to determine the dynamic load of bucket tip of an excavator during contacting a buried gas pipeline, dynamic and static response tests were performed to reflect two action modes including static load and impact of a hydraulic backhoe excavator's bucket tip contacting the pipeline. Load time-history curves were simulated with ADAMS multi-body dynamics software according to the dynamic test data. STEP function and the script control technology were combined and used, the dynamic force transfer process of the excavator was converted into the displacement and speed control of cylinders, then the dynamic load time-history curves of the bucket tip of the extreme were obtained during the excavator contacting the pipe with five-tooth and one-tooth. Finally, the dynamic load time-history curves were induced into the finite element commercial software ANSYS/LS-DYNA, the dynamic response of the pipe was analyzed, the dynamic strain response of the pipe agreed well with field test results. The test and calculation results showed that the proposed method to determine the bucket tip load of a mining machinery based on the combination of test and numerical simulation is feasible, and the research can provide correct data for quantitative assessment of mechanical damage of a buried gas pipeline under mining machinery actions.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 46
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Muhlbauer W.K., Pipeline Risk Management Manual , (1996)
  • [2] Bolt R., Database reflects recent trends, pp. 48-54, (2001)
  • [3] Jones D., Kramer G., Gideon D., Et al., An Analysis of Reportable Incidents for Natural Gas Transmission and Gathering Lines 1970 Through June 1984. Technical Report 158, (1986)
  • [4] Wang T., Zheng H.-L., Song H.-C., Et al., Integrity management of urban gas pipeline network , Gas Storage and Transportation, 31, 3, pp. 184-187, (2012)
  • [5] Xu T.-L., Yao A.-L., Jiang H.-Y., Et al., Key techniques of risk assessment of oil and gas pipelines damaged by third party , Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 33, 2, pp. 150-154, (2011)
  • [6] Roovers P., Steiner M., Zarea M., EPRG recommendations for the assessment of the tolerance and resistance of pipelines to external damage, 11th PRCI/EPRG Joint Technical Meeting, (1997)
  • [7] Champavere R., Dezobry J., Philibert C., Et al., The pipe aggression rig: A comprehensive means for studying pipe resistance to third party damage, 11th PRCI/EPRG Joint Technical Meeting, (1997)
  • [8] Zarea M., Deo I., Philibert C., Full Scale Experimental Approach of Gas Transmission Pipeline Resistance to Dynamic Puncture, 11th PRCI/EPRG Joint Technical Meeting, (1997)
  • [9] Zarea M., Deo I., Philibert C., Et al., EPRG dynamic puncture tests: A video film, 11th PRCI/EPRG Joint Technical Meeting, (1997)
  • [10] Chatain P., An experimental evaluation of punctures and resulting dents in transmission pipelines, Proceedings of the 8th Symposium on Line Pipe Research, (1993)