Exergames as tools used on interventions to cope with the effects of ageing: a systematic review

被引:3
作者
Velazquez, Amado [1 ]
Campos-francisco, Wilfrido [2 ]
García-vázquez, Juan Pablo [3 ]
López-nava, Hussein [4 ]
Rodríguez, Marcela Deyanira [3 ]
Isaac PéRez-San Pablo, Alberto [5 ]
Martínez-rebollar, Alicia [2 ]
Estrada-esquivel, Hugo [6 ]
Martinez-garcía, Ana [1 ]
Muñoz-meléndez, AngéLica [4 ]
Favela, JesúS [1 ]
机构
[1] CICESE, Ensenada
[2] CENIDET, Cuernavaca
[3] Engineering School, UABC, Mexicali
[4] INAOE, Puebla
[5] INR, Mexico City
[6] Industry Information and Documentation Fund, INFOTEC, Mexico City
来源
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) | 2014年 / 8868卷
关键词
Exergames; Health Condition; Older Adults; Systematic Review;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-13105-4_59
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Exergames are currently used as a new tool for medical purposes. In this context, this paper presents an overview of the approaches used to gather evidence about the use and impact of exergames-based interventions on elderly. In total, 2306 abstracts were returned from a database search, yielding 52 relevant papers. Our analysis found a group of papers mostly published in engineering forums with emphasis on evaluating novel technologies and an evaluation providing low-evidence, another group of studies, published mostly in medical journals, use more conventional technologies, but conduct more comprehensive evaluations from which stronger evidence is obtained. © 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland.
引用
收藏
页码:402 / 405
页数:3
相关论文
共 5 条
[1]  
Larsen L.H., Schou L., Lund H.H., Langberg H., The Physical Effect of Exergames in Healthy Elderly—A Systematic Review, Games for Health J, 2, 4, pp. 205-212, (2013)
[2]  
Kueider A.M., Parisi J.M., Gross A.L., Rebok G.W., Computerized cognitive training with older adults: A systematic review, PLoS ONE, 7, 7, (2012)
[3]  
Khangura S., Et al., Evidence summaries: The evolution of a rapid review approach, Systematic reviews, 1, 1, pp. 1-9, (2012)
[4]  
Howick J., Et al., Explanation of the 2011 Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) Levels of Evidence (Background Document), (2011)
[5]  
References to the 52 studies reported on this Systematic Review, (2014)