The association between mindfulness, psychological flexibility, and rumination in predicting mental health and well-being among university students using machine learning and structural equation modeling

被引:0
作者
Feng, Ruohan [1 ]
Mishra, Vaibhav [2 ]
Hao, Xin [3 ]
Verhaeghen, Paul [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Psychol, North Ave, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[2] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Comp Sci, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Psychol & Human Dev, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
来源
MACHINE LEARNING WITH APPLICATIONS | 2025年 / 19卷
关键词
Mindfulness; Psychological flexibility; Rumination; Well-being; Machine learning; Random Forest (RF); COMMITMENT THERAPY; SELF-COMPASSION; INTERVENTIONS; ACCEPTANCE; REGRESSION; DEPRESSION; WORRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.mlwa.2024.100614
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Objectives: This study explores the intricate relationships between mindfulness, psychological flexibility, rumination, and their combined impact on mental health and well-being. Methods: Random forest regression on survey data from 524 undergraduate students was used to identify significant predictors from a comprehensive set of psychological variables. Neural networks were then trained on various combinations of these predictors to evaluate their performance in predicting mental health and wellbeing outcomes. Finally, structural equation modeling (SEM) was employed to validate a model based on the identified key predictors, focusing on pathways from mindfulness through psychological flexibility to rumination and well-being. Results: The random forest analysis revealed that the mindfulness variables exerted their influence partially indirectly through psychological flexibility and rumination. The deep neural network analysis supported these findings and additionally showed that the mindfulness manifold model (consisting of self-awareness, self-regulation, and self-transcendence) was superior to the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire variables in predicting mental health outcomes. The SEM analysis confirmed that psychological flexibility, particularly its avoidance and acceptance components, mediated the relationship between mindfulness and mental health. The hypothesized serial mediation pathway-mindfulness affecting psychological flexibility, which then influences rumination and subsequently mental health and well-being-was supported by the data. Self-transcendence was a particularly powerful predictor of mental health outcomes. Conclusions: The findings underscore the critical role of psychological flexibility and rumination in mediating the effects of mindfulness on mental health and well-being, suggesting that enhancing mindfulness and psychological flexibility might significantly reduce rumination, thereby improving overall mental health and well-being.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] On the Relation Between Mindfulness and Depressive Symptoms: Rumination as a Possible Mediator
    Alleva, Jessica
    Roelofs, Jeffrey
    Voncken, Marisol
    Meevissen, Yvo
    Alberts, Hugo
    [J]. MINDFULNESS, 2014, 5 (01) : 72 - 79
  • [2] The linear random forest algorithm and its advantages in machine learning assisted logging regression modeling
    Ao, Yile
    Li, Hongqi
    Zhu, Liping
    Ali, Sikandar
    Yang, Zhongguo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 174 : 776 - 789
  • [3] Aydin Y., 2016, Testing a model of psychological inflexibility, ruminative thinking, worry and self-compassion in relation to college adjustment
  • [4] Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness
    Baer, RA
    Smith, GT
    Hopkins, J
    Krietemeyer, J
    Toney, L
    [J]. ASSESSMENT, 2006, 13 (01) : 27 - 45
  • [5] The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being
    Brown, KW
    Ryan, RM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 84 (04) : 822 - 848
  • [6] Letting Go as an Aspect of Rumination and Its Relationship to Mindfulness, Dysphoria, Anxiety, and Eudemonic Well-Being
    Caswell, Jesse R.
    Duggirala, Aishwarya N.
    Verhaeghen, Paul
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 2022, 12 (10)
  • [7] Defining and measuring "psychological flexibility": A narrative scoping review of diverse flexibility and rigidity constructs and perspectives
    Cherry, Kathlyn M.
    Vander Hoeven, Erin
    Patterson, Timothy S.
    Lumley, Margaret N.
    [J]. CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2021, 84
  • [8] Assessment of Trait and State Aspects of Depression in Schizophrenia
    Chiappelli, Joshua
    Nugent, Katie L.
    Thangavelu, Kavita
    Searcy, Katherine
    Hong, L. Elliot
    [J]. SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 2014, 40 (01) : 132 - 142
  • [9] Examining the correlates of psychological flexibility in romantic relationship and family dynamics: A meta-analysis
    Daks, Jennifer S.
    Rogge, Ronald D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONTEXTUAL BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 2020, 18 : 214 - 238
  • [10] The Mini-IPIP scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the big five factors of personality
    Donnellan, M. Brent
    Oswald, Frederick L.
    Baird, Brendan M.
    Lucas, Richard E.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2006, 18 (02) : 192 - 203