Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: Guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems

被引:0
作者
Venkatesh, Viswanath [1 ]
Brown, Susan A. [2 ]
Bala, Hillol [3 ]
机构
[1] Department of Information Systems, Walton College of Business, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
[2] Management Information Systems Department, Eller College of Management, University of Arizona, Tucson
[3] Operations and Decision Technologies, Kelley School of Business, Indiana University, Bloomington
来源
MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems | 2013年 / 37卷 / 01期
关键词
Meta-inferences; Mixed methods; Multimethod; Positivist; Qualitative; Quantitative; Research design; Research method; Validity;
D O I
10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.1.02
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Mixed methods research is an approach that combines quantitative and qualitative research methods in the same research inquiry. Such work can help develop rich insights into various phenomena of interest that cannot be fully understood using only a quantitative or a qualitative method. Notwithstanding the benefits and repeated calls for such work, there is a dearth of mixed methods research in information systems. Building on the literature on recent methodological advances in mixed methods research, we develop a set of guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in IS. We particularly elaborate on three important aspects of conducting mixed methods research: (1) appropriateness of a mixed methods approach; (2) development of meta-inferences (i.e., substantive theory) from mixed methods research; and (3) assessment of the quality of meta-inferences (i.e., validation of mixed methods research). The applicability of these guidelines is illustrated using two published IS papers that used mixed methods. Copyright © 2013 by the Management Information Systems Research Center (MISRC) of the University of Minnesota.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 54
页数:33
相关论文
共 147 条
[61]  
Kayworth T.R., Leidner D.E., Leadership effectiveness in global virtual teams, Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 3, pp. 7-40, (2002)
[62]  
Keeney R.L., The value of internet commerce to the customer, Management Science, 45, 4, pp. 533-542, (1999)
[63]  
Keil M., Im G.P., Mahring M., Reporting bad news on software projects: The effects of culturally constituted views of face-saving, Information Systems Journal, 17, 1, pp. 59-87, (2007)
[64]  
Keil M., Tiwana A., Relative importance of evaluation criteria for enterprise systems: A conjoint study, Information Systems Journal, 16, 3, pp. 237-262, (2006)
[65]  
Keil M., Tiwana A., Bush A., Reconciling user and project manager perceptions of it project risk: A delphi study, Information Systems Journal, 12, 2, pp. 103-119, (2002)
[66]  
Kirk J., Miller M.L., Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research, (1986)
[67]  
Klein H.K., Myers M.D., A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems, MIS Quarterly, 23, 1, pp. 67-93, (1999)
[68]  
Koh C., Ang S., Straub D.W., IT outsourcing success: A psychological contract perspective, Information Systems Research, 15, 4, pp. 356-373, (2004)
[69]  
Koufaris M., Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior, Information Systems Research, 13, 2, pp. 205-223, (2002)
[70]  
Landry M., Banville C., A disciplined methodological pluralism for MIS research, Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 2, 2, pp. 77-97, (1992)