Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: Guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems

被引:0
作者
Venkatesh, Viswanath [1 ]
Brown, Susan A. [2 ]
Bala, Hillol [3 ]
机构
[1] Department of Information Systems, Walton College of Business, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
[2] Management Information Systems Department, Eller College of Management, University of Arizona, Tucson
[3] Operations and Decision Technologies, Kelley School of Business, Indiana University, Bloomington
来源
MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems | 2013年 / 37卷 / 01期
关键词
Meta-inferences; Mixed methods; Multimethod; Positivist; Qualitative; Quantitative; Research design; Research method; Validity;
D O I
10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.1.02
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Mixed methods research is an approach that combines quantitative and qualitative research methods in the same research inquiry. Such work can help develop rich insights into various phenomena of interest that cannot be fully understood using only a quantitative or a qualitative method. Notwithstanding the benefits and repeated calls for such work, there is a dearth of mixed methods research in information systems. Building on the literature on recent methodological advances in mixed methods research, we develop a set of guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in IS. We particularly elaborate on three important aspects of conducting mixed methods research: (1) appropriateness of a mixed methods approach; (2) development of meta-inferences (i.e., substantive theory) from mixed methods research; and (3) assessment of the quality of meta-inferences (i.e., validation of mixed methods research). The applicability of these guidelines is illustrated using two published IS papers that used mixed methods. Copyright © 2013 by the Management Information Systems Research Center (MISRC) of the University of Minnesota.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 54
页数:33
相关论文
共 147 条
[1]  
Senior Scholars' Basket of Journals, (2007)
[2]  
Alvesson M., Karreman D., Constructing mystery: Empirical matters in theory development, Academy of Management Review, 32, 4, pp. 1265-1281, (2007)
[3]  
Ang S., Slaughter S.A., Work outcomes and job design for contract versus permanent information systems professionals on software development teams, MIS Quarterly, 25, 3, pp. 321-350, (2001)
[4]  
Archer M., Bhaskar R., Collier A., Lawson T., Norrie A., Critical Realism: Essential Readings, (1998)
[5]  
Bala H., Venkatesh V., Assimilation of interorganizational business process standards, Information Systems Research, 18, 3, pp. 340-362, (2007)
[6]  
Beaudry A., Pinsonneault A., Understanding user responses to information technology: A coping model of user adaptation, MIS Quarterly, 29, 3, pp. 493-525, (2005)
[7]  
Beaudry A., Pinsonneault A., The other side of acceptance: Studying the direct and indirect effects of emotions on it use, MIS Quarterly, 34, 4, pp. 689-710, (2010)
[8]  
Becerra-Fernandez I., Sabherwal R., Organization knowledge management: A contingency perspective, Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 1, pp. 23-55, (2001)
[9]  
Bhaskar R., A Realist Theory of Science, (1978)
[10]  
Bhattacherjee A., Premkumar G., Understanding changes in belief and attitude toward information technology usage: A theoretical model and longitudinal test, MIS Quarterly, 28, 2, pp. 229-254, (2004)