THERMO-ECONOMIC OPTIMIZATION OF SOLAR-DRIVEN ORGANIC RANKINE CYCLE

被引：0

作者：

Ma, Piyin ^{[1
]}

Chai, Junlin ^{[1
]}

Yang, Fubin ^{[2
]}

Zhang, Hongguang ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] College of Energy and Power Engineering, Inner Mongolia University of Technology, Hohhot

[2] Faculty of Environment and Life, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing

来源：

Taiyangneng Xuebao/Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica | 2024年 / 45卷 / 10期

关键词：

economy; genetic algorithms; parabolic trough solar collecor; Rankine cycle; solar energy; thermodynamics;

D O I：

10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2023-0858

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

According to the heat collection characteristics of parabolic trough solar collector，R600 and R245fa are selected as circulating working fluids. The thermo-economic models of basic organic Rankine cycle（BORC）and the ORC system with internal heat exchanger（IHE-ORC）are established with the exergy efficiency and levelized energy cost（LEC）as objectives，respectively. Bi-objective optimization is conducted using the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm. The optimal thermo-economic performance of two systems with two working fluids are obtained using TOPSIS with entropy weight method integrated. The variations of thermo-economic performance of the systems with evaporation pressure，superheat degree and condensation temperature are analyzed. The results show that，under optimization and decision making，when R245fa is used，IHE-ORC system has clear advantage in thermodynamic performance with the optimal exergy efficiency and LEC of 54.11% and 0.1548 $/kWh，respectively. When R600 is used，BORC system exhibits better economic performance with the optimal exergy efficiency and LEC of 49.89% and 0.1318 $/kWh，respectively. Within the variation range of operating parameters，the exergy efficiency and LEC of IHE-ORC system are always higher than those of BORC，and much higher exergy efficiency is obtained when using R245fa，while much lower LEC is achieved when using R600. © 2024 Science Press. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：381 / 390

页数：9

共 27 条

[11]

AHMADI A, EL HAJ ASSAD M, JAMALI D H，, Et al., Applications of geothermal organic Rankine cycle for electricity production［J］, Journal of cleaner production, 274, (2020)

[12]

NONDY J, GOGOI T K., Exergoeconomic investigation and multi-objective optimization of different ORC configurations for waste heat recovery：a comparative study ［J］, Energy conversion and management, 245, (2021)

[13]

FENG Y Q, ZHANG Y N, LI B X，, Et al., Comparison between regenerative organic Rankine cycle（RORC）and basic organic Rankine cycle （BORC） based on thermoeconomic multi-objective optimization considering exergy efficiency and levelized energy cost （LEC）［J］, Energy conversion and management, 96, pp. 58-71, (2015)

[14]

BLIEM C，, ZANGRANDO F, HASSANI V., Value analysis of advanced heat rejection systems for geothermal power plants［C］//IECEC 96, Proceedings of the 31st Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference, pp. 1616-1621, (1996)

[15]

LI H J, WANG P Y，, FAN W., Performance analysis of two organic Rankine cycle generation systems［J］, Acta energiae solaris sinica, 38, 6, pp. 1667-1673, (2017)

[16]

WANG L B, LI H S., Multi-objective optimization and off-design evaluation of organic Rankine cycle（ORC）for low-grade waste heat recovery［J］, Energy, 203, (2020)

[17]

WANG S K, LIU C, ZHANG S J，, Et al., Multi-objective optimization and fluid selection of organic Rankine cycle （ORC） system based on economic-environmental-sustainable analysis［J］, Energy conversion and management, 254, (2022)

[18]

TURTON R, SHAEIWITZ J A, BHATTACHARYYA D, Et al., Analysis， synthesis， and design of chemical processes［M］, (2018)

[19]

KAKAC S, LIU H T，, PRAMUANJAROENKIJ A., Heat exchangers：selection，rating，and thermal design［M］, (2020)

[20]

GURGEN S，, KAHRAMAN H T，, ARAS S，, Et al., A comprehensive performance analysis of meta-heuristic optimization techniques for effective organic Rankine cycle design［J］, Applied thermal engineering, 213, (2022)

← 1 2 3 →