China's economic restructuring helps improve land-use resilience of carbon metabolism: Evidences from three Chinese megacities

被引:0
作者
Xia, Linlin [1 ]
Fu, Wenqi [1 ]
Ke, Yuhan [1 ]
Wang, Ruwei [2 ]
Liang, Sai [1 ]
Yang, Zhifeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Univ Technol, Guangdong Basic Res Ctr Excellence Ecol Secur & Gr, Sch Ecol Environm & Resources, Key Lab City Cluster Environm Safety & Green Dev,M, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China
[2] Jinan Univ, Coll Environm & Climate, Guangdong Prov Key Lab Environm Pollut & Hlth, Guangzhou 511443, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Land-use carbon emissions; Network resilience; Socioeconomic determinants; Scenario analysis; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SUSTAINABILITY; EMISSIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124686
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Megacities are significant land users and major contributors to global carbon emissions. It is urgent to enhance land-use resilience of megacities through a low carbon strategy. This necessitates a comprehensive understanding of the interactions between decarbonization and land-use resilience from a systematic network perspective. Using ecological network analysis combined with scenario projection methods, this study examined the temporal trends and socioeconomic determinants of the network resilience of carbon metabolism in three Chinese megacities (i.e., Beijing, Shanghai, and Shenzhen) from 2000 to 2030. Our findings suggest that inefficient land expansion directly increased network redundancy, leading to higher carbon emissions and deteriorated land-use resilience. Furthermore, network resilience significantly declined as net carbon emissions neared their peak. Economic restructuring, driven by changes in structure- and efficiency-oriented factors, revealed both co-benefits and trade-offs between decarbonization efforts and network resilience. These improvements were mainly achieved through coupled strategies, with Beijing demonstrating the highest network resilience value (0.3524) during the last stage, compared to Shanghai (0.2810) and Shenzhen (0.2138). Scenario analysis highlighted notable fluctuations in network resilience in response to interventions, underscoring the need for adaptive measures to balance network efficiency and redundancy. To achieve low carbon and resilient development, Beijing must focus on structural transformation, Shenzhen on reducing energy intensity, and Shanghai on improving energy use efficiency. Our study provides valuable insights into the intricate relationship between urban economic resilience and low-carbon development, offering key implications for sustainable urban planning and management.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]   LMDI decomposition approach: A guide for implementation [J].
Ang, B. W. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2015, 86 :233-238
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2021, 14 5 YEAR PLAN 2035
[3]  
Beijing Municipal Commission of Development and Reform (BJMCDR), 2011, Energy conservation, consumption reduction and climate change planning in Beijing during the twelfth five-year period, P1
[4]  
Beijing Municipal Commission of Development and Reform (BJMCDR), 2011, The twelfth five-year plan for the high-tech industry development of Beijing, P1
[5]  
BSY, 2019, Beijing Statistical Yearbook, VFirst
[6]   A review of urban resilience literature [J].
Buyukozkan, Gulcin ;
Ilicak, Oyku ;
Feyzioglu, Orhan .
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2022, 77
[7]   Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Coastal Wetlands and Reclamation in the Yangtze Estuary During Past 50 Years (1960s-2015) [J].
Chen Lin ;
Ren Chunying ;
Zhang Bai ;
Li Lin ;
Wang Zongming ;
Song Kaishan .
CHINESE GEOGRAPHICAL SCIENCE, 2018, 28 (03) :386-399
[8]   Network Environ Perspective for Urban Metabolism and Carbon Emissions: A Case Study of Vienna, Austria [J].
Chen, Shaoqing ;
Chen, Bin .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 46 (08) :4498-4506
[9]  
Clean Air Alliance of China (CAAC), 2013, Air pollution prevention and control action plan
[10]  
Communist Party of China Central Committee and the State Council (CCSC), 2021, Guiding document on the country's work to achieve carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals under the new development philosophy