6.5.2 Modeling and Analysis Framework for Risk-Informed Decision Making for FAA NextGen

被引:0
|
作者
机构
[1] Blackburn, Mark R.
[2] Pyster, Art
[3] Zigh, Teresa
[4] Turner, Richard
[5] Dillon-Merrill, Robin
来源
| 1600年 / John Wiley and Sons Inc卷 / 23期
关键词
Analysis and models - Analysis frameworks - Causal relationships - Federal Aviation Administration - Modelling and analysis - Modelling framework - Next-generation air transportation systems - NEXTGEN - Non-technical factors - Risk-informed decision making;
D O I
10.1002/j.2334-5837.2013.tb03027.x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper discusses an analysis and modeling framework that is being developed to support risk-informed decision-making for the Federal Aviation Administration Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen). Discussions with over 60 stakeholders identified challenges for those responsible for planning, developing, and deploying NextGen capabilities. There are a confluence of technical and non-technical factors that are important to effectively roll out capabilities. People's internal knowledge is much greater than what is captured externally or formally. Additionally, this knowledge and the causal relationships to program factors are not formalized in a way to support this complex decision-making process. The paper describes a Bayesian network-based analysis and modeling framework with usage scenarios for calculating cost, schedule and benefit risks to support collaborative decision-making throughout the phases of the FAA's acquisition lifecycle process. © 2013 The Authors.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Misconceptions and stereotypes regarding experts providing support for risk-informed decision making
    Maes, Marc A.
    CIVIL ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, 2019, 36 (01) : 73 - 82
  • [42] Risk-Informed Decision Making: More Critical Today Than Ever Before
    Watson, Crystal
    Mullen, Lucia
    HEALTH SECURITY, 2020, 18 (03) : 153 - 154
  • [43] Risk-informed control systems for improved operational performance and decision-making
    Thieme, Christoph A.
    Rokseth, Borge
    Utne, Ingrid B.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART O-JOURNAL OF RISK AND RELIABILITY, 2023, 237 (02) : 332 - 354
  • [44] Application of PRA for risk-informed decision-making on a space station payload
    Paulos, T
    Flippen, AA
    PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, VOL 1- 6, 2004, : 1702 - 1707
  • [45] Development of a Geographic Information System for Risk-Informed Decision Making in Aerospace Medicine
    Paskoff, Lawrence
    AEROSPACE MEDICINE AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 2016, 87 (11) : 972 - 975
  • [46] Value Tree Analysis Approach for Integrated Risk-Informed Decision Making: Revision of Allowed Outage Time
    Kaushik, Poorva P.
    Kim, SokChul
    RELIABILITY, SAFETY AND HAZARD ASSESSMENT FOR RISK-BASED TECHNOLOGIES, 2020, : 957 - 966
  • [47] Importance analysis in risk-informed decision-making of changes to Allowed Outage Times addressing uncertainties
    Martorell, S.
    Villamizar, M.
    Villanueva, J. F.
    Carlos, S.
    Sanchez, A. I.
    ADVANCES IN SAFETY, RELIABILITY AND RISK MANAGEMENT, 2012, : 2143 - 2151
  • [48] Modeling and analysis of uncertainties for risk-informed decisions in infrastructures engineering
    Ang, A. H. -S.
    De Leon, D.
    STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2005, 1 (01) : 19 - 31
  • [49] A Risk-Informed Decision-Making Framework for Climate Change Adaptation through Robust Land Use and Irrigation Planning
    Ermolieva, Tatiana
    Havlik, Petr
    Frank, Stefan
    Kahil, Taher
    Balkovic, Juraj
    Skalsky, Rastislav
    Ermoliev, Yuri
    Knopov, Pavel S.
    Borodina, Olena M.
    Gorbachuk, Vasyl M.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (03)
  • [50] A Simulation-Based Framework for Earthquake Risk-Informed and People-Centered Decision Making on Future Urban Planning
    Cremen, Gemma
    Galasso, Carmine
    McCloskey, John
    EARTHS FUTURE, 2022, 10 (01)