Advances in verification and validation in computational fluid dynamics

被引:0
|
作者
Chen J. [1 ]
Xiao W. [1 ]
Zhao W. [1 ]
Zhang P. [1 ]
Yang F. [1 ]
Jin T. [1 ]
Guo Y. [1 ]
Wu X. [1 ]
Chen J. [1 ]
Wang R. [2 ]
Li L. [3 ]
机构
[1] China Aerodynamics Research and Development Centers, Sichuan, Mianyang
[2] Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics, Beijing
[3] Xi’an Aeronautics Computing Technique Research Institute, AVIC, Xi’an
关键词
calibration model experiment; error estimation; uncertainty quantification; verification and validation;
D O I
10.6052/1000-0992-23-012
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has played an increasingly important role in major engineering fields, and its credibility is the key constraint to its further extensive engineering application. It is widely accepted home and abroad that verification and validation is the only way to evaluate and guarantee the credibility of CFD. Through systematic verification and validation, the potential programming errors can be effectively identified, the reliability of numerical solving process can be guaranteed, the adequacy and prediction capability of mathematical models in the intended use can be objectively evaluated and improved when necessary. In this paper, with regard to two key issues, ‘what is verification and validation’ and ‘how to perform verification and validation’, the research progress of verification and validation in CFD is introduced from the aspects including basic concept, implementation processes, main methods, calibration model experiments and platform tools, with focusing on numerical error estimation and uncertainty quantification. At the end, the shortcomings of current research are reviewed and the key research directions are prospected. © 2023 Advances in Mechanics.
引用
收藏
页码:626 / 660
页数:34
相关论文
共 143 条
  • [1] Chen J Q., Advances in the key technologies of Chinese national numerical windtunnel project, Scientia Sinica Technologica, 51, pp. 1326-1347, (2021)
  • [2] Chen S S, Liu L Y, Yan C, Et al., Design and realization of automated testing cloud platform for CFD verification and validation, Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 38, (2017)
  • [3] Liang Y H, Yang Y, Zhu C., CFD credibility analysis platform WiseCFD, pp. 775-780, (2004)
  • [4] Liu Z Y, Wang X D, Kang S., CFD simulation of uncertain tip clearance effect on compressor performance, Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 34, pp. 628-631, (2013)
  • [5] Shao S, Li M, Wang N H, Et al., High-order DDG/FV hybrid method for viscous flow simulation on unstructured/hybrid grids, Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 50, pp. 1470-1482, (2018)
  • [6] Song F Q, Yan C, Ma B F, Et al., Uncertainty analysis of aerodynamic characteristics for cone-derived waverider configuration, Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 39, (2018)
  • [7] Tang T, Zhou T., Recent developments in high order numerical methods for uncertainty quantification, Scientia Sinica:Mathematica, 45, pp. 891-928, (2015)
  • [8] Wang N H, Zhang L P, Zhao Z, Et al., Accuracy verification of unstructured second-order finite volume discretization schemes based on the method of manufactured solutions, Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 49, pp. 627-637, (2017)
  • [9] Wang R L, Lin Z, Yuan G X., Verification and validation in scientific computing code, Transactions of Beijing Institute of Technology, 30, pp. 353-360, (2010)
  • [10] Wang Y T, Liu G, Chen Z B., Summary of the first aeronautical computational fluid dynamics credibility workshop, Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 37, pp. 247-261, (2019)