Comparison of the linear and non linear methods for the evaluation of measurement uncertainty

被引:0
|
作者
Martins M.A.F. [1 ]
Kalid R.A. [1 ]
Nery G.A. [2 ]
Teixeira L.A. [2 ]
Gonçalves G.A.A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Universidade Federal da Bahia, Escola Politécnica, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Industrial, Salvador
[2] Universidade Federal da Bahia, Escola Politécnica, Colegiado do Curso de Engenharia Química, Salvador
来源
Controle y Automacao | 2010年 / 21卷 / 06期
关键词
Measurement uncertainty; Monte Carlo method; Non linear models; Propagation of probability density functions; Propagation of uncertainties;
D O I
10.1590/s0103-17592010000600002
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The main method recognized by the metrologists for the evaluation of measurement uncertainty is de facto the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (ISO Guide). Due to some limitations of the proposed method by ISO Guide however, ISO has developed a supplementary method for evaluating the measurement uncertainty based on the propagation of probability density functions using the Monte Carlo method (ISO-S1). The present paper discusses these methods for the quantification of measurement uncertainty. We review the literature, in particular the main papers presenting these modern approaches. We also discuss the merits and the limitations of the ISO Guide and ISO-S1 approaches. Furthermore, a comparative study between these two methods was carried out in two case studies. The obtained results show that it is necessary to evaluate the influence of the degree of non linearity in order to estimate the measurement uncertainty before either method is chosen.
引用
收藏
页码:557 / 576
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Exchange rate uncertainty and trade growth - a comparison of linear and non-linear (forecasting) models
    Herwartz, H
    Weber, H
    APPLIED STOCHASTIC MODELS IN BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY, 2005, 21 (01) : 1 - 26
  • [2] Evaluation of measurement uncertainty for analytical procedures using a linear calibration function
    Brüggemann, L
    Wenrich, R
    ACCREDITATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2002, 7 (07) : 269 - 273
  • [3] Measurement uncertainty of the instantaneous characteristics of non-linear coil obtained by Dommel's method
    Milicevic, Kruno
    Biondic, Ivan
    Vulin, Dragan
    IET SCIENCE MEASUREMENT & TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 11 (08) : 1049 - 1057
  • [4] Measurement Uncertainty Analysis of a Stitching Linear-Scan Method for the Evaluation of Roundness of Small Cylinders
    Li, Qiaolin
    Shimizu, Yuki
    Saito, Toshiki
    Matsukuma, Hiraku
    Gao, Wei
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (14):
  • [5] Advanced Methods for Measurement Uncertainty Evaluation
    Zakharov, Igor
    Botsiura, Olesia
    2022 XXXII INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC SYMPOSIUM METROLOGY AND METROLOGY ASSURANCE (MMA), 2022, : 19 - 22
  • [6] ISO Linear Calibration and Measurement Uncertainty of the Result Obtained With the Calibrated Instrument
    Palencar, Jakub
    Palencar, Rudolf
    Chytil, Miroslav
    Wimmer, Gejza, Jr.
    Wimmer, Gejza
    Witkovsky, Viktor
    MEASUREMENT SCIENCE REVIEW, 2022, 22 (06) : 293 - 307
  • [7] Comparison of the influence of CMM measurement strategies on uncertainty evaluation
    Li, Hongli
    Chen, Xiaohuai
    Wang, Hongtao
    Yang, Qiao
    Wang, Hanbin
    Cheng, Yinbao
    SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PRECISION MECHANICAL MEASUREMENTS, 2016, 9903
  • [8] Comparison of measurement uncertainty calculation methods on example of indirect tensile strength measurement
    Tutmez, Bulent
    GEOMECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2017, 12 (06) : 871 - 882
  • [9] Effects of the uncertainty contributions on the methods used for measurement uncertainty evaluation
    Jakab, Dorottya
    Pazmandi, Tamas
    Zagyvai, Peter
    APPLIED RADIATION AND ISOTOPES, 2021, 173
  • [10] A simple method for Bayesian uncertainty evaluation in linear models
    Wubbeler, Gerd
    Marschall, Manuel
    Elster, Clemens
    METROLOGIA, 2020, 57 (06)