Supply chain performance measurement systems: A qualitative review and proposed conceptual framework

被引：0
作者：
Khan S.A. [1 ,2 ]
Chaabane A. [2 ]
Dweiri F. [2 ]
机构：
[1] Department of Automated Manufacturing Engineering, École de Technologie Supérieure, Montréal
[2] Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management Department, University of Sharjah, Sharjah
来源：
International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering | 2020年 / 34卷 / 01期
关键词：
Integrated framework; Knowledge base system; Qualitative review; SCM; SCPMS; Supply chain management; Supply chain performance measurement systems;
D O I：
10.1504/IJISE.2020.104315
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Management of supply chain (SC) is becoming more challenging with every passing day due to high competition, globalisation, and digitalisation because of the recent adoption of internet of things (IoT) technologies in order to increase supply chain visibility. Due to this fact, importance of supply chain performance measurement systems (SCPMS) has been increased significantly. To cope with these challenges and remain competitive, organisations are keen to evaluate SC performance more precisely. Therefore, this paper adopts a qualitative review methodology to find out if existing SCPMS are in line with the current emerging technology trends of managing SC and measuring SC performance and if not, what will be the characteristics of future SCPMS. Results show particularly that existing SCPMSs are not adequate to cope with the complexity and the technology advancement observed in supply chain management as a smart way for measuring modern SC performance is needed. Finally, this study proposes a conceptual supply chain performance measurement (SCPM) framework to fill the identified research gaps. © 2020 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码：43 / 64
页数：21
相关论文
共 69 条
[41]  
Levy D.L., International sourcing and supply chain stability, Journal of International Business Studies, 26, 2, (1995)
[42]  
Lima-Junior F.R., Carpinetti L.C.R., Quantitative models for supply chain performance evaluation: A literature review, Computers and Industrial Engineering, 113, pp. 333-346, (2017)
[43]  
Lin C.T., Chiu H., Chu P.Y., Agility index in the supply chain, International Journal of Production Economics, 100, 2, pp. 285-299, (2006)
[44]  
Maestrini V., Luzzini D., Caniato F., Ronchi S., Measuring supply chain performance: A lifecycle framework and a case study, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38, 4, pp. 934-956, (2018)
[45]  
Maestrini V., Luzzini D., Maccarrone P., Caniato F., Supply chain performance measurement systems: A systematic review and research agenda, International Journal of Production Economics, pp. 299-315, (2017)
[46]  
Manikandan M., Chidambaranathan S., Developing a two-dimensional framework to review the supply chain performance measurement literature, International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, 43, 2, pp. 86-96, (2017)
[47]  
Marwah A., Thakar G., Gupta R., Determinants of supply chain performance in the indian manufacturing organizations, Proposed Conceptual Model, 5, 1, pp. 14-27, (2014)
[48]  
Mathiyalagan P., Mannan K., Parthiban P., Performance Evaluation in Supply Chain Using Balanced Scorecard, 1, 1, pp. 4-10, (2014)
[49]  
Miranzadeh A., Sajadi S.M., Tavakoli M.M., Simulation of a single product supply chain model with ARENA, International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 19, 1, (2015)
[50]  
Mishra P., Sharma R.K., Measuring business performance in a SCN using Six Sigma methodology - A case study, International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 25, 1, pp. 76-109, (2017)
1234567