From expected improvement to investment portfolio improvement: Spreading the risk in kriging-based optimization

被引:0
作者
机构
[1] Research and Technology, Grundfos Management A/S, Poul Due Jensens Vej 7, Bjerringbro
来源
Ursem, Rasmus K (ursem@cs.au.dk) | 1600年 / Springer Verlag卷 / 8672期
关键词
Expected improvement; Kriging; Prescreening methods;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-10762-2_36
中图分类号
O24 [计算数学];
学科分类号
070102 ;
摘要
The increasing use of time-consuming simulations in the industry has spawned a growing interest in coupling optimization algorithms with fast-to-compute surrogate models. A major challenge in this approach is to select the approximated solutions to evaluate on the real problem. To address this, the Kriging meta-model offers both an estimate of the mean value and the standard error in an unknown point. This feature has been exploited in a number of so-called prescreening utility functions that seek to maximize the outcome of an expensive evaluation. The most widely used are the Probability of Improvement (PoI) and Expected Improvement (ExI) functions. This paper studies this challenge from an investment portfolio pointof- view. In short, the PoI favors low risk investments whereas the ExI promotes high risk investments. The paper introduces the investment portfolio improvement (IPI) approach as a strategy mixing the two extremes. The novel approach is applied to seven benchmark problems and two real world examples from the pump industry. © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014.
引用
收藏
页码:362 / 372
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Dennis J., Torczon V., Managing approximate models in optimization, Alexandrov, N., Hussani, M. (eds.) Multidisciplinary design optimization: State-of-the-art, pp. 330-347, (1997)
[2]  
Ulmer H., Streichert F., Zell A., Evolution strategies assisted by gaussian processes with improved pre-selection criterion, Proceedings of the 2003 Congress on Evolutionary Computation CEC 2003, December 8-12, pp. 692-699, (2003)
[3]  
Jones D.R., Schonlau M., Welch W.J., Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions, Journal of Global Optimization, 13, 4, pp. 455-492, (1998)
[4]  
Sheng N., Liao C., Lin W., Chang L., Zhang Q., Zhou H., A hybrid optimized algorithm based on ego and taguchi’s method for solving expensive evaluation problems of antenna design, Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, 17, pp. 181-192, (2010)
[5]  
Jeong S., Minemura Y., Obayashi S., Optimization of combustion chamber for diesel engine using kriging model, Journal of Fluid Science and Technology, 1, 2, pp. 138-146, (2006)
[6]  
Couckuyt I., Declercq F., Dhaene T., Rogier H., Knockaert L., Surrogate-based infill optimization applied to electromagnetic problems, International Journal of RF and Microwave Computer-Aided Engineering, 20, 5, pp. 492-501, (2010)
[7]  
Emmerich M.T., Giannakoglou K.C., Naujoks B., Single- and Multiobjective Evolutionary Optimization Assisted by Gaussian Random Field Metamodels, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 10, 4, pp. 421-439, (2006)
[8]  
Das S., Mukherjee R., Kundu R., Vasilakos T., Multi-user detection in multicarrier cdma wireless broadband system using a binary adaptive differential evolution algorithm, GECCO 2013: Proceeding of the Fifteenth Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, July 6-10, pp. 1245-1252, (2013)
[9]  
Ursem R.K., Vadstrup P., Parameter identification of induction motors using differential evolution, Proceedings of the Fifth Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC-2003), pp. 790-796, (2003)
[10]  
Storn R., Price K., Differential evolution - a simple and efficient adaptive scheme for global optimization over continuous spaces. Technical Report TR-95-012, (1995)