Responses of the net primary productivity of vegetation to phenological changes in Beijing of China

被引:0
|
作者
Wei X. [1 ,2 ]
Gao Y. [3 ]
Fan Y. [4 ]
Lin L. [3 ]
Mao J. [1 ,2 ]
Zhang D. [5 ]
Li X. [1 ,2 ]
Liu X. [1 ,2 ]
Xu M. [1 ,2 ]
Tian Y. [1 ,2 ]
Liu P. [1 ,2 ]
Jia X. [1 ,2 ]
Zha T. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing
[2] Key Laboratory of State Forestry Administration on Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing
[3] Planning and Monitoring Center of Beijing Forestry and Landscape, Beijing
[4] The Department of Management for Songshan National Reserve, Beijing
[5] Miyun District Forestry and Parks Bureau, Beijing
关键词
climate change; NDVI; net primary productivity; remote sensing; vegetation phenology;
D O I
10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2022.18.018
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Net Primary Productivity (NPP) of vegetation is considered one of the main indicators for the carbon fixation capacity of ecosystems in the carbon cycle, particularly for the adaptability of ecosystems to climate change. Among them, the typical phenological factors are the key components of the ecosystem functions in many biological processes, including the Start of the Growing Season (SOS), End of the Growing Season (EOS), and Length of the Growing Season (LOS). However, it is still lacking in the relative importance of phenological and climatic factors to the NPP. The contribution of phenological factors (SOS, EOS, and LOS) to the interannual change of NPP has not been well quantified, due to the complex ecosystem. Therefore, this study aims to extract the phenological information of vegetation using a Cardiovascular-Ames-Stanford Approach (CASA) model, in order to examine the characteristics of spatial and temporal changes of NPP. The Normalized Vegetation Index (NDVI) was used from the MODIS data in Beijing from 2001 to 2020. The interaction between meteorological factors, phenological changes, and NPP was then explored using linear regression, trend analysis, and structural equation modeling. The results show that the SOS was gradually advanced by 0.57 each year on average from 2001 to 2020 over more than 70% of the regions, whereas, the EOS was gradually postponed by an average of 0.51 days per year over more than 90% of the regions. The NPP vegetation increased significantly from 2001 to 2020 (P < 0.05), where the growth rate was greater in the last 10 years than that in the first 10 years. The average annual NPP value was greater in the northern region than that in the southern. There was a strong correlation between the phenological factors (SOS, and LOS) and NPP (P<0.05). The pixel-by-pixel analysis also found that the SOS, LOS, and NPP were significantly correlated in the areas with more than 75% vegetation coverage. The NPP was also significantly affected by the advance of SOS and extension of LOS (P<0.05). The NPP increased by 3.74 g/m2 for every single day advance of SOS, while by 2.65 g/m2 for every single day extension of LOS. There was no significant effect of the EOS delay in autumn on the NPP. A coupling effect of phenology and climatic factors varied with the season. There was a greater indirect effect of climate through changing phenology (SOS and EOS) on the NPP in spring and autumn, compared with the direct. By contrast, the NPP was more directly affected by climatic factors, temperature, and rainfall in summer. In conclusion, the spring phenological change was an important driving factor for the interannual variation in the NPP. Furthermore, the annual NPP increased to the phenological advance. The findings can also provide an important supplement to determine the vegetation productivity response to the climate change in urban areas. © 2022 Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 175
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Wang K, Wang X H, Piao S L, Et al., Unusual characteristics of the carbon cycle during the 2015-2016 El Nino[J], Global Change Biology, 27, 16, pp. 3798-3809, (2021)
  • [2] Wang L Q, Hans J D B, Chen L X, Et al., Urban warming increases the temperature sensitivity of spring vegetation phenology at 292 cities across China, Science of the Total Environment, 834, (2022)
  • [3] Li M H, Wang X Y, Chen J C., Assessment of grassland ecosystem services and analysis on its driving factors: A case study in Hulunbuir Grassland, Frontiers in Ecology Evolution, 10, (2022)
  • [4] Frank D, Reichstein M, Bahn M, Et al., Effects of climate extremes on the terrestrial carbon cycle: Concepts processes and potential future impacts, Global Change Biology, 21, pp. 2861-2880, (2015)
  • [5] Yin Xiaojun, Zhu Honghui, Gao Jerry, Et al., Effects of climate change and human activities on net primary productivity in the Northern Slope of Tianshan, Xinjiang, China, Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 36, 20, pp. 195-202, (2020)
  • [6] Xu Yong, Zheng Zhiwei, Dai Qiangyu, Et al., Attribution analysis of vegetation NPP variation in Southwest China considering time-lag effects, Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 38, 9, pp. 297-305, (2022)
  • [7] Richardson A D, Anderson R S, Arain M A, Et al., Terrestrial biosphere models need better representation of vegetation phenology: results from the North American Carbon Program Site Synthesis, Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 18, 2, pp. 566-584, (2012)
  • [8] Liu Q, Piao S, Janssens I A, Et al., Extension of the growing season increases vegetation expo‐sure to frost, Nature Communications, 21, 6, pp. 2366-2378, (2018)
  • [9] Piao S L, Liu Q, Chen A, Et al., Plant phenology and global climate change: Current progresses and challenges[J], Global Change Biology, 25, 6, pp. 1922-1940, (2019)
  • [10] Piao S, Fang J, Zhou L, Et al., Variations in satellite-derived phenology in China's temperate yegetation, Global Change Biology, 12, pp. 672-685, (2006)