Connecting Computational Thinking (CT) Concept with the Game-Based Learning (GBL) Elements

被引:5
作者
Yunus E. [1 ]
Zaibon S.B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Institut Pendidikan Guru Kampus Sultan Abdul Halim, Kedah
[2] Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah
关键词
computational thinking; design model; game-based learning;
D O I
10.3991/ijim.v15i20.23739
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study aims to identify the game-based learning component (GBL) and the concept of computational thinking (CT) that can be integrated together in a design model. GBL and CT concept components are obtained through analysis of previous research and specialist consultancy. The method of analytical analysis consists of three phases i.e. planning, implementation and documentation. This analysis started on March to May 2020 and involved 398 articles related to GBL and CT. However, there are only fifteen articles on the development element of the GBL application and eight articles related to the CT concept were used. During an expert consultancy, fifteen specialists was involved in various backgrounds and experience in GBL and CT. The result shows that there are six main elements and 21 sub-elements of GBL. 6 main elements consist of rules, objectives, feedback, interactions, challenges and narrative. Mean-while, the sub-element consists of the operating rules, basic rules, explicit rules and behaviours, measures, goals, gamification purposes, marks, re-wards, badges/awards, player charts, characters, consequences, constraints, levels of games, fun, competition, control, space, engagement and curiosity that have been matched with their main elements. The main element and sub-element of the GBL is called GBL component. Each of these GBL components is integrated with seven concepts of CT i.e. decomposition, algorithm, abstraction, logical reasoning, assessment, evaluation, pattern recognition and automation. © 2021
引用
收藏
页码:50 / 67
页数:17
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [31] Barr D., Harrison J., Conery L., Computational Thinking: A Digital Age Skill for Everyone, Learning and Leading with Technology, 38, 6, pp. 20-23, (2011)
  • [32] Wing J. M., Computational Thinking: What and Why?, The link - The Magazine of the Varnegie Mellon University School of Computer Science, pp. 1-6, (2010)
  • [33] Voskoglou M. G., Buckley S., Problem Solving and Computers in a Learning Environment, 36, 4, pp. 28-46, (2012)
  • [34] Dede C., Mishra P., Voogt J., Working Group 6: Advancing computational thinking in 21st century learning, (2013)
  • [35] Zaibon S. B., Yunus E, Perceptions of Computational Thinking in Game Based Learning for Improving Student Problem Solving Skills, International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering, 8, 1.3 S1, pp. 181-184, (2019)
  • [36] Mohaghegh M., Mccauley M., Computational Thinking: The Skill Set of the 21st Century, 7, 3, pp. 1524-1530, (2016)
  • [37] Settle A., Computational thinking in a game design course, SIGITE’11—Proceedings of the 2011 ACM Special Interest Group for Information Technology Education Conference, pp. 61-66, (2011)
  • [38] Kitchenham B., Procedures for performing systematic reviews, Keele, UK, Keele University, 33, pp. 1-26, (2004)
  • [39] Altanis I., Retalis S., Petropoulou O., Education sciences Systematic Design and Rapid Development of Motion-Based Touchless Games for Enhancing Students’ Thinking Skills, (2018)
  • [40] Bockle M., Micheel I., Bick M., Novak J., A Design Framework for Adaptive Gamification Applications, Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS ‘18), pp. 1227-1236, (2018)