UAV formation control: Theory and application

被引:133
作者
Research School of Information Sciences and Engineering, Australian National University, National ICT Australia, Canberra, Australia [1 ]
不详 [2 ]
机构
[1] Research School of Information Sciences and Engineering, Australian National University, National ICT Australia, Canberra
[2] Delft Center for Systems and Control, Delft University of Technology, Delft
来源
Lect. Notes Control Inf. Sci. | 2008年 / 15-33期
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Formation control; Persistent formation; Rigid formation; Surveillance; UAV;
D O I
10.1007/978-1-84800-155-8_2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Unmanned airborne vehicles (UAVs) are finding use in military operations and starting to find use in civilian operations. UAVs often fly in formation, meaning that the distances between individual pairs of UAVs stay fixed, and the formation of UAVs in a sense moves as a rigid entity. In order to maintain the shape of a formation, it is enough to maintain the distance between a certain number of the agent pairs; this will result in the distance between all pairs being constant. We describe how to characterize the choice of agent pairs to secure this shape-preserving property for a planar formation, and we describe decentralized control laws which will stably restore the shape of a formation when the distances between nominated agent pairs become unequal to their prescribed values. A mixture of graph theory, nonlinear systems theory and linear algebra is relevant. We also consider a particular practical problem of flying a group of three UAVs in an equilateral triangle, with the centre of mass following a nominated trajectory reflecting constraints on turning radius, and with a requirement that the speeds of the UAVs are constant, and nearly (but not necessarily exactly) equal. © 2008 Springer London.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 33
页数:18
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Hubbard S., Babak B., Sigurdsson S., Magnusson K., A model of the formation of fish schools and migrations of fish, Ecological Modelling, 174, pp. 359-374, (2004)
  • [2] Janson S., Middendorf M., Beekman M., Honey bee swarms: How do scouts guide a swarm of uninformed bees?, Animal Behaviour, 70, 1, pp. 349-358, (2005)
  • [3] Shao J., Xie G., Wang L., Leader-following formation control of multiple mobile vehicles. IET, Control Theory and Applications, 1, pp. 545-552, (2007)
  • [4] Tay T., Whiteley W., Generating isostatic frameworks, Structural Topology, 11, pp. 21-69, (1985)
  • [5] Jackson B., Jordan T., Connected rigidity matroids and unique realizations of graphs, Journal of Combinatorial Theory B, 94, pp. 1-29, (2004)
  • [6] Olfati-Saber R., Murray R.M., Distributed cooperative control of multiple vehicle formations using structural potential functions, Proc. of the 15th IFAC World Congress, pp. 1-7, (2002)
  • [7] Eren T., Whiteley W., Morse A.S., Belhumeur P.N., Anderson B.D., Sensor and network topologies of formations with direction, bearing and angle information between agents, Proceedings of the 42nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 3064-3069, (2003)
  • [8] Lin Z., Francis B., Maggiore M., Necessary and sufficient graphical conditions for formation control of unicycles, IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, 50, pp. 121-127, (2005)
  • [9] Yu C., Hendrickx J., Fidan B., Anderson B., Blondel V., Three and higher dimensional autonomous formations: Rigidity, persistence and structural persistence, Automatica, 387-402, (2007)
  • [10] Laman G., On graphs and rigidity of plane skeletal structures, J. Engrg. Math, 4, pp. 331-340, (1970)